Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#101      
Darryl and Moses: RIP. Gone way too soon. And died two weeks apart.

Here's 18 y.o. Moses for the Utah Stars v. the San Diego Conquistadores in the Salt Palace at the outset of his rookie season, 1974. I was in third grade and got one of those fabulous RW&B balls for Xmas that year or the following one.

View attachment 35129
1717348813259.png
 
#104      
Darryl and Moses: RIP. Gone way too soon. And died two weeks apart.

Here's 18 y.o. Moses for the Utah Stars v. the San Diego Conquistadores in the Salt Palace at the outset of his rookie season, 1974. I was in third grade and got one of those fabulous RW&B balls for Xmas that year or the following one.

View attachment 35129
Basketball and basketball stadiums have come a long way since then. Side note - things I don’t miss from the 70’s: knee high socks and short shorts.
 
#107      
I never said we were the favorite.

And Illinois is never "listed" because he put out a "final five" announcement about a month or 2 ago and it was those five schools/leagues - not Illinois - that were on it.

But the thing is: things have changed - a lot has changed (Orlando). We're gonna getting him on campus.

He just hasn't expanded his list - but that doesn't mean a thing (kinda like that we're hidden from all the smoke) - the staff's greatly in pursuit.
"Is that the most likely outside of Illinois?" - That implies we are #1 or #2.

I'm quite aware that those lists are old and that since hiring Antigua he has some interest in us. That said, he has interest in at least four other schools, as well as the NBL. And of course, we don't even know if he's reclassifying.
 
#108      
You don't see Riley playing ahead of Tre or Ty or Ben? Lol.. If Riley comes here he is a starter the moment he steps foot on campus
I mean maybe. But he would also be reclassing and haven't seen a ton guys make an impact as freshman when they do so.

For example, Ive seen Riley ranked between 10-20 nationally for 25. Boswell was a top 15 recruit before reclassing and he didn't play much as a freshman and had an up and down sophomore season before transferring. Now, two points in Riley's favor are that he is already 18(typical age of an incoming freshman) and he's a lot taller which I think helps make the transition easier.

However with all that being said, Tre White and Ty Rodgers were also pretty heralded recruits and a couple years older. Tre is already 21 and was a top 30ish recruit nationally, Ty is 20 and was a top 50-60 recruit. Humrichous obviously came out of obscurity but will be 22 in July and has played 4 seasons of college ball.

I know the insiders on this board are very high on Riley but recruiting rankings cease to matter the 2nd you step on campus and in my opinion he would have his work cut out for him competing against Ty, Tre, and Ben(Booth too honestly).
 
#110      
You don't see Riley playing ahead of Tre or Ty or Ben? Lol.. If Riley comes here he is a starter the moment he steps foot on campus
It depends upon how much improvement Ty and Tre show. If we were to achieve that situation, you start the player that gives you the best chance to win. Given how much improvement that we saw from Ty last season, I can see him coming to camp having developed an outside shooting game. If Riley were to have his challenges on defense as a freshman, I could definitely see Ty starting over Riley if Ty shows up with a viable shooting game.
 
Last edited:
#111      
Just meant to ask if Zona was the biggest threat to prevent us from getting him.

And honestly...

Just Asking No Big Deal GIF by Bleacher Report


Is it truly that unrealistic to say that we are #1 or #2?

With Orlando and the crew...I can def. see our sell being more intriguing than some of the schools on his list...
 
#113      
It depends upon how much improvement Ty and Tre show. If we were to achieve that situation, you start the player that gives you the best chance to win. Given how much improvement that we saw from Ty last season, I can see him coming to camp having developed an outside shooting game. If Riley were to have his challenges on defense as a freshman, I could definitely see Ty starting over Riley if Ty shows up with a viable shooting game.
I'd be happy with a mid-range game. Easier for him to develop that first. When he gets confident with 6-15 ft shots, then move on to 3-pt shooting.
 
#114      
I'd be happy with a mid-range game. Easier for him to develop that first. When he gets confident with 6-15 ft shots, then move on to 3-pt shooting.
If Ty has a consistent 10 to 15 foot jump shot this year he will be all big ten.
 
#116      
I’ve seen others touch on it, the problem is, you don’t even want good shooters shooting from 15ft. If Ty’s taking that shot this year, the offense gets a lot worse.
Does it? It allows him to operate in the pick and roll & makes his man stay within 15 ft instead of full drop coverage.

Plus it is an absolute must if he wants a career in basketball, so it would be nice to see for him.
 
#117      
I'd be happy with a mid-range game. Easier for him to develop that first. When he gets confident with 6-15 ft shots, then move on to 3-pt shooting.
I doubt it's much easier to be 50% from 15ft (in a game) than it is to be 33.3% from 3 unless the player's form severely limits their range. In which case they probably don't want to reinforce that form anyway.

Edit: I know 50% from mid-range and 33% from 3 aren't efficient; they're just round points of comparison
 
#118      
Does it? It allows him to operate in the pick and roll & makes his man stay within 15 ft instead of full drop coverage.

Plus it is an absolute must if he wants a career in basketball, so it would be nice to see for him.
If I'm Ty I'm working on developing a floater, and shooting free throws. If he can shoot 50% from the floor and 75% at the line with his ability to guard and rebound he's an NBA player.
 
#119      
"Is that the most likely outside of Illinois?" - That implies we are #1 or #2.

I'm quite aware that those lists are old and that since hiring Antigua he has some interest in us. That said, he has interest in at least four other schools, as well as the NBL. And of course, we don't even know if he's reclassifying.
Just meant to ask if Zona was the biggest threat to prevent us from getting him.

And honestly...

Is it truly that unrealistic to say that we are #1 or #2?

With Orlando and the crew...I can def. see our sell being more intriguing than some of the schools on his list...
 
#120      
I’ve seen others touch on it, the problem is, you don’t even want good shooters shooting from 15ft. If Ty’s taking that shot this year, the offense gets a lot worse.
My reasoning is if he exclusively works on shooting from 3-pt range, he's making the process more difficult for himself. Develop a touch from 6-15 ft, then gradually work on further out. You can't start running if you don't walk first.
 
#121      
I doubt it's much easier to be 50% from 15ft (in a game) than it is to be 33.3% from 3 unless the player's form severely limits their range. In which case they probably don't want to reinforce that form anyway.

Edit: I know 50% from mid-range and 33% from 3 aren't efficient; they're just round points of comparison
None of this past year's Illini with any reasonable shot volume exceeded 42% on mid-range jumpers:
1717359185493.png


It's only a good shot if you have no other options, you might get fouled, or it's the end of the game and you only need 1 or 2 points. Even "keeping the defense honest" sounds like a bad reason, since they'll happily let you take that shot over and over and live with the consequences, so it isn't forcing an adjustment.
 
#122      
My reasoning is if he exclusively works on shooting from 3-pt range, he's making the process more difficult for himself. Develop a touch from 6-15 ft, then gradually work on further out. You can't start running if you don't walk first.
I just don’t think it’s gonna happen. It would be one thing if Ty was a subpar shooter, like a 27% from 3 kinda guy. Hoping those types of shooters live in the gym and improve their percentage is realistic. Since Ty literally doesn't shoot whatsoever I just don’t think it’s realistic at this point in his development to expect any sort of reliable jumper from anywhere on the floor.
 
#123      
I just don’t think it’s gonna happen. It would be one thing if Ty was a subpar shooter, like a 27% from 3 kinda guy. Hoping those types of shooters live in the gym and improve their percentage is realistic. Since Ty literally doesn't shoot whatsoever I just don’t think it’s realistic at this point in his development to expect any sort of reliable jumper from anywhere on the floor.
I see what you're saying and I fear that may be the case. OTOH it's not impossible. Where there's a will there's a way. His most effective way to get there is to work with a shooting coach and do lots of repetition. Start with 6 ft - 9 ft shots, extend to 10-14 ft shots and and eventually add 3 pt shots. Hundreds of shots a day. If he wants to play in the NBA he pretty much has to do it.
 
#124      
Basketball and basketball stadiums have come a long way since then. Side note - things I don’t miss from the 70’s: knee high socks and short shorts.
Hey now. I grew up in the '70s wearing those tube socks.:ROFLMAO:

I'll grant you the latter (stadiums). Not so sure about the former (the game itself). I watched the Bill Russell documentary last year; those Celtics teams of the '60s seemed to match or exceed the best of the NBA today. Celtics, Knicks, Lakers of the late '60s were stratospheric in quality.

BTW, regarding that photo of Moses in the Salt Palace: the ABA ran on a shoe string but the Utah Stars drew well in that arena, sometimes the 12k+ capacity, and the Jazz played there until the early '90s after relocating from New Orleans in the late '70s.

My earliest NBA memories (~ 1971 or so) were of watching the Bullets v. Knicks epic playoff battles on TV. Baltimore (before the franchise moved to DC) played in the Baltimore Civic Center, which still stands. Check out a YouTube video of those games. That arena is a complete anachronism. (And those Bullets unis were absolutely bad a$$. I've still got basketball cards from that era with guys like Phil Chenier and Wes Unseld rockin' that kit.)

1717361463814.png
 
#125      
I just don’t think it’s gonna happen. It would be one thing if Ty was a subpar shooter, like a 27% from 3 kinda guy. Hoping those types of shooters live in the gym and improve their percentage is realistic. Since Ty literally doesn't shoot whatsoever I just don’t think it’s realistic at this point in his development to expect any sort of reliable jumper from anywhere on the floor.
I’m not holding my breath expecting Ty to make huge strides with his shooting, but it’s not unheard of for a big (back to basket guy) to expand his shooting range out to 10-12 feet as he develops. So I could see that happening. Much more unlikely that he develops a 3-point shot this offseason IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back