Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      
Nonsense. You start the players at every position who give you the best chance to win. That should have nothing to do with how many stars they earn as recruits. It should have everything to do with how well they are performing as members of the team currently. Marcus Liberty was our most hyped recruit ever. He didn't start for the 88-89 Illini team because there were better players ahead of him, and rightly so. Nothing should be different now. Five start players should not expect guarantees. They should expect a fair chance to earn the right to start.
I agree in general with what you’re saying, but Marcus Liberty was 35 years ago. Things have changed somewhat since then. I’ve even heard rumors players can actually earn pretty good money now and transfer multiple times.
 
#52      
If you bring in a 5 star kid and don't start him, don't expect to get another 5 star any time soon.
Shaking Head Reaction GIF by GIPHY News
 
#53      
For all the narrative here about BU insisting on defense, I think he's actually more offense-oriented than most college ball coaches. Virtually all coaches are sticklers for defense to a certain degree (because a player's shot might not be "on" every day, but his defensive effort can be)

But your last point is valid -- if you want to play in the NBA, you'd better be able to play reasonably good defense.
I agree…with a few notable exceptions:
* think I found the only known picture of Fran smiling
IMG_2487.jpeg
 
Last edited:
#57      
My worries aren't just chemistry. Have you watched Riley's clips? As incredible as he is offensively, he hardly plays defense. And he's not a particularly good run/jump athlete, so even if motivated I'm not sure he'd be a strong defender. And defense IMO is a worry with next year's team. We'll very likely be a really good offensive team, but defense I'm not so certain about. Kylan, KJ, Hum, and Ivisic (all likely starters) don't look to me like strong defenders (I concede I've only seen Kylan extensively).

And chemistry is a very legitimate concern. Generally, I say get as much talent as you can, and let them compete (the Duke/Kentucky/UNC formula). But when we have only two guys returning, I think it's a concern.

That said, if BU & Co think adding Riley will work, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. Do we really have the funds?
Last year's team coming into the season on paper looked grear defensively and most on here said our defense would be really good and we could play many different styles. Then the season went on and our defense was the worst part of our team and we struggled.

I think this years team has a chance to be better on defense due to having a true 5 Ivisic and then multiple guards to stay in front of quicker opposing guards. Then some strong wings. I just think its harder to teach offense then defense.
 
#58      
Well it is. There are not many things that haven't changed in 35 years. No one, except Moses Malone, was one and done back then. Today's 5 star guys are all looking at being one and done. Harder to do that when you're not getting 30 mpg. Also, it's a completely different story when you're stepping into an experienced team that is national championship caliber, vs stepping into a team that has 2 returning players that combined for 9 ppg last season.

There's also the money component. People aren't going to pony up the money it takes to get a 5 star guy to see him get 20 mpg.

If Riley were to commit, and reclassify. Our starting lineup is Boswell, Jakucionis, Riley, Humrichous, Ivisic. Morez is first big off the bench, White or Rodgers first wing.
There are a few one and done, 1st round guys this year that averaged fewer than 25 minutes a game.
Furphy, George, Edwards…
NBA scouts mostly care about upside.
 
#59      
Well it is. There are not many things that haven't changed in 35 years. No one, except Moses Malone, was one and done back then. Today's 5 star guys are all looking at being one and done. Harder to do that when you're not getting 30 mpg. Also, it's a completely different story when you're stepping into an experienced team that is national championship caliber, vs stepping into a team that has 2 returning players that combined for 9 ppg last season.

There's also the money component. People aren't going to pony up the money it takes to get a 5 star guy to see him get 20 mpg.

If Riley were to commit, and reclassify. Our starting lineup is Boswell, Jakucionis, Riley, Humrichous, Ivisic. Morez is first big off the bench, White or Rodgers first wing.
I'm old, and maybe my memory is fading, but I recall Moses Malone being a "none and done"... that he signed right out of high school with an ABA team.
 
#61      
Last year's team coming into the season on paper looked grear defensively and most on here said our defense would be really good and we could play many different styles. Then the season went on and our defense was the worst part of our team and we struggled.

I think this years team has a chance to be better on defense due to having a true 5 Ivisic and then multiple guards to stay in front of quicker opposing guards. Then some strong wings. I just think its harder to teach offense then defense.
Lot of defense is effort - and not just effort on the court but on the scouting reports, etc Trent Frazier showed what you can become when you focus on that part of your game without any elite athletic skills.

To your point, lot of offensive skill doesn’t happen overnight. I’m sure Ty has worked his butt off the past 2 years on his shot, it’s just not an overnight thing. But, you look at a guy like D’monte who went from a non offense threat to a quality shooter if left completely open - just took multiple years to get there.
 
#63      
One poster has, at least on two occasions, questioned whether anyone knows if T. Ivisic and/or K. Jakucionis will have any eligibility problems with the NCAA, ala Z. Ivisic at Kentucky last season. I worry less about T. Ivisic because Illinois has Johnson and Booth who are both capable of playing the 5 until TI becomes eligible. But I worry more about Jakucionis because he is one of only 3 guards on the current Illinois roster for next season.

Going into the early part of the season with Boswell and DGL as our only two guards would not be ideal. (I know that some of you will say that Rodgers is a guard, but I feel that is more in name/title only.) I think there would be less of a worry if anyone could definitively say that Jeremiah Fears is definitely coming to Illinois after the first semester AND that Fears will definitely play for the Illini in the second semester. It would probably be okay for the Illini to go with just the two guards, and work through any eligibility problems with Jakucionis, early in the season IF it was certain that Fears would be playing for Illinois after the first semester. If those are not certainties with Fears, and if no one conclusively knows that Illinois will not have eligibility problems with KJ, then I think that the Illini might want to recruit and sign another transfer guard for depth purposes.

Of course, that signing would get in the way of having an available scholarship for Will Riley, IF he reclassifies, and IF he actually commits to the Illini. Those are some BIG ifs! I wish that we had more clarity, more confidence, on whether Illinois has a real/good chance to get a Riley commitment. The Illini should certainly NOT pass on an opportunity to sign an uber talented player like Will Riley! That far outweighs any worries about KJ's potential eligibility issues and building depth at the guard position.
 
Last edited:
#64      
I'm old, and maybe my memory is fading, but I recall Moses Malone being a "none and done"... that he signed right out of high school with an ABA team.
Yeah, that's right. My overall point though was that the mindset of a 5 star guy is much different now than it was 35 years ago. They're demanding huge money and going to expect to get to the league quickly. Whether or not that happens is a different question, but the expectation is there.
 
#65      
Have you watched Riley's clips? As incredible as he is offensively, he hardly plays defense. And he's not a particularly good run/jump athlete, so even if motivated I'm not sure he'd be a strong defender.
I've only seen a few Youtube clips and he didn't play much D nor did he look very explosive run-jump wise.
Just "a few YT clips" here and there shouldn't be enough to immediately come to the judgement of "he hardly plays defense."

If he comes, he'll be the best shot maker BU has had here. Not best player - that would be Shannon or Ayo. Not best shooter - that would be Plummer.

But best shot maker - there really isn't a shot that he doesn't have in his arsenal - catch & shoot, pull up 3s, pull up mid-range, fadeaway off the bounce... - you name it...

In terms of the defensive end...he's def. got the ability to hold up on that end...especially if he adds some strength. Feel like that's what he's got to improve the most - the strength aspect - only 180 at 6"8...

Who better for him than Fletch?
 
#66      
One poster has, at least on two occasions, questioned whether anyone knows if T. Ivisic and/or K. Jakucionis will have any eligibility problems with the NCAA, ala Z. Ivisic at Kentucky last season. I worry less about T. Ivisic because Illinois has Johnson and Booth who are both capable of playing the 5 until TI becomes eligible. But I worry more about Jakucionis because he is one of only 3 guards on the current Illinois roster for next season.

Going into the early part of the season with Boswell and DGL as our only two guards would not be ideal. (I know that some of you will say that Rodgers is a guard, but I feel that is more in name/title only.) I think there would be less of a worry if anyone could definitively say that Jeremiah Fears is definitely coming to Illinois after the first semester AND that Fears will definitely play for the Illini in the second semester. It would probably be okay for the Illini to go with just the two guards, and work through any eligibility problems with Jakucionis, early in the season IF it was certain that Fears would be playing for Illinois after the first semester. If those are not certainties with Fears, and if no one conclusively knows that Illinois will not have eligibility problems with KJ, then I think that the Illini might want to recruit and sign another transfer guard for depth purposes.

Of course, that signing would get in the way of having an available scholarship for Will Riley, IF he reclassifies, and IF he actually commits to the Illini. Those are some BIG ifs! I wish that we had more clarity, more confidence, on whether Illinois has a real/good chance to get a Riley commitment. The Illini should certainly NOT pass on an opportunity to sign an uber talented player like Will Riley! That far outweighs any worries about KJ's potential eligibility issues and building depth at the guard position.
😂😂😂😂😂😂

That’s soooooo 2023!!!!

😂😂😂😂😂😂
 
#74      
Don't write off Arizona.
Is that the most likely one outside of Illinois?

I honestly don't see what they have to sell over us...outside of maybe history of doing well with Canadian talent...?

He's got more chance to start here than there and that's pretty much a surety.

Maybe NIL? But pretty sure I read somewhere (I think CBS) that they've ran into a crunch $$ wise after getting Caleb Love back...and that's what led to those top 50 guys leaving...

But also saw somewhere that it was because they wanted to start...

Who knows...

Just really want him here...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back