I love bringing numbers into these discussions so my counter would be sometimes numbers mislead.
Looking at the above, it appears Ty is more efficient offensively because he's passing to scorers and he's attempting to score 33% less than Tre. However (and stick with me, because it gets nuanced here), Ty's FG% looks better on the surface because he's not shooting any 3's. If you compare just 2P%, it's very close. Tre's FT% also blows Ty's out of the water, and FT% is often used to indicate how much a player's shot can improve.
So when it comes specifically to scoring, I'd rather take Tre, despite him appearing worse in terms of efficiency. It's clear he's a far greater offensive threat. My guess is Ty's inability to shoot leads to his inflated assist total, while Tre, who can shoot, has less assists and hopefully improves his 3-pt shooting a tad.
When it comes to defensive rating, people generally agree that it's hard to quantify between players on different teams because it relies heavily on the team, so their ratings are close enough it's not a concern for me. To me it appeared Rodgers often cleaned up on defense because he knew he's an offensive liability so had to make up for it or else he'd hit the bench.
