I thought it made sense. With no more than 2 possessions left, that thirteenth point of a lead rarely matters (only when the other team coverts two two-point conversions and leaves you enough time for a last second field goal try). A fourteenth point is almost always big. Does the chance of making an eighteen yard 2-point conversion exceed the chance of a thirteenth point lead being more useful than a 12 point lead? Yeh, maybe.I can usually play devil’s advocate on almost any topic, but going for 2 from the 18 is beyond me.
77 will do (one hopes)so 100 next week?
so 100 next week?
77so 100 next week?
Anyone who says that they weren't 99% sure that we were going to lose when Purdue lined up for 2 is a liar.
4th floor, everyone else partied all the timeWhat floor?
Which is more than a take...Ugly game, I've lost my voice but at the end of the day we are 5-1
4th and Goal from the 18 is an EXTREMELY low percentage play. 5% max. That changes the two point math a ton, you're giving up serious expected value which you should never do unless you're forced to by an end game scenario (which this was not, there were 5 mins left)Does the chance of making an eighteen yard 2-point conversion exceed the chance of a thirteenth point lead being more useful than a 12 point lead? Yeh, maybe.
Not me, I figured the D would take that as a dis and play out of their minds for the first time all half.Anyone who says that they weren't 99% sure that we were going to lose when Purdue lined up for 2 is a liar.
McCray should be the No. 1 back now. He has been maybe the most consistent back all year. I don’t understand Lafferty ahead of him. Valentine is a great runner but has real pass blocking issues. It looked to me like Luke’s sack fumble was due to a missed Valentine block.