Makes sense. I would note that Kofi and Davis have virtually idential usage rates (33.4 Kofi vs. 33.3 Davis) and Kofi has a much better ORtg (122.6 vs. 108.9). In fact, Trent, who in the original post was the comparison for Davis, has a better ORtg than Davis as well 113.6, though lower usage (20.0).Yeah I was just reading about this yesterday in that little rabbit hole I went down. The article linked below talks about a “skill curve” and suggests that you should compare players with “like”’usage numbers. Below is the excerpt and link.
- In a later chapter of Basketball on Paper, Oliver emphasized that Offensive Ratings shouldn't be viewed in a vacuum. Introducing a concept he called "Skill Curves", he acknowledged that a player's ORtg needed to be judged in conjunction with his Usage Rate, a measure of how big a role the player fills in his team's offense. The bigger the role, the more difficult it is to maintain a high ORtg; the smaller the role, the easier it is to be highly efficient. Because of this, Oliver stressed that a player's ORtg should primarily be compared to those of other players in a similar role.
Calculating Individual Offensive and Defensive Ratings | Basketball-Reference.com
How to calculate individual offensive and defensive ratingswww.basketball-reference.com