Not sure if this has been posted here, but USC is offering a free year of B1G+
But it has been tenner.it’s certainly never been bigger
Just out of due diligence with ACC lawsuits ongoing, ND would be negligent to not be talking’s to the SEC, B1G, and Big 12.I stumbled upon this article a bit ago, sounds like ND might be talking with B1G, and ND is not pushing for Stanford to come with. Can anyone corroborate that ND and B1G are talking? The article also notes that Michigan, OSU, and others might want Texas A&M too, which I am open to. Thoughts?
Notre Dame not asking Big Ten to include Stanford in conference realignment
Notre Dame reportedly wants in on the Big Ten, but according to longtime college football radio host Greg Swaim, the Fighting Irish have no concerns about whethflywareagle.com
sure , but they aren’t going to be publicly acknowledging any of that .Just out of due diligence with ACC lawsuits ongoing, ND would be negligent to not be talking’s to the SEC, B1G, and Big 12.
Everything publicly is pointing to it still being a requirement. If they drop that requirement and the ACC grant of rights is removed/reduced. I would bet the BIG would try too swipe ND, FSU, TAMU, and one of Clemson or UNC.Will the B1G abandon its requirement that schools be members of the AAU (Association of American Universities, not the other AAU) to join the conference?
Well technically the Nebraska route would them being apart of the AAU then after a year in the B1G they get booted from the AAU. Nebby was removed from the AAU if I remember correctly after the AAU changed how they viewed their Med school not counting anymore for the main campus since it was/is at the Omaha campus.The B1G could also go the Nebraska route and admit a school but require them to be in the process of admittance to the AAU.
I'm not sure their is a real requirement to be AAU, ND just recently added AAU & it seems pretty clear that wouldn't have stopped them from joining the B1G.Will the B1G abandon its requirement that schools be members of the AAU (Association of American Universities, not the other AAU) to join the conference?
I do not believe it is a requirement .I'm not sure their is a real requirement to be AAU, ND just recently added AAU & it seems pretty clear that wouldn't have stopped them from joining the B1G.
I do not believe it is a requirement .
it’s simply preferred , as it confirms the institutions commitment to research .
it’s a major reason that the B1G & PAC were always closely aligned .
pretty good...also makes me wonder if the B1G wouldn't be better off with A&M than having to deal with Texas. Texas is easily the bigger fish, but A&M isn't bad & seems like a lot less of a headache.I think this is pretty funny:
Maybe you’re right. I dunno. (As I’ve learned from this board…)One potential strike against A&M might be their mightily bizarre and cultish fan-base tho. Lol.pretty good...also makes me wonder if the B1G wouldn't be better off with A&M than having to deal with Texas. Texas is easily the bigger fish, but A&M isn't bad & seems like a lot less of a headache.
I tried to sign up but it they said offer has been paused. Probably too many non USC B10 fans trying to sign up.Not sure if this has been posted here, but USC is offering a free year of B1G+
I tried to sign up but it they said offer has been paused. Probably too many non USC B10 fans trying to sign up.
Since I live in SoCal they should have no way of knowing I am an Illini fan.
View attachment 35966
Population (proxy for TV markets)follow up: obviously, breaking into the Florida and Texas markets would be a major coup. Clemson and UNC aren't close.