Conference Realignment, Naming Rights, Financing

#51      
any remaining B12 school is NOT getting invited to B1G/SEC

that ship has sailed .
To clarify, I'm saying that both The Big 12 Conference (as a whole) and the schools that want out of the ACC, are incentivized to leak this sort of news.

Not, that there are Big 12 schools with realistic eyes on the BIG/SEC.
 
#52      
I mean FSU and Clemson have had a decent amount of time to adapt to the shifting cfb landscape and didn't, so it's really hard to have any sympathy for them. Particularly because the ACC I would argue is more competitive now than when it would have made a lot more sense to jump earlier.
 
#53      
I mean FSU and Clemson have had a decent amount of time to adapt to the shifting cfb landscape and didn't, so it's really hard to have any sympathy for them. Particularly because the ACC I would argue is more competitive now than when it would have made a lot more sense to jump earlier.

I think the reason they didn’t jump ship is because they signed a pretty much iron clad grant of rights deal with the ACC in 2016 that runs through 2036.

So if they opt out now they would miss financial payouts from both the ACC and the conference they left for, because the ACC owns their broadcast rights until 2036.

No one is looking at the ACC for expansion, because those schools bring nothing to the table until 2036 for revenue to the league. Genius stroke on the ACC’s part, but it’s souring their member school relationships with the conference.
 
#54      
I mean FSU and Clemson have had a decent amount of time to adapt to the shifting cfb landscape and didn't, so it's really hard to have any sympathy for them. Particularly because the ACC I would argue is more competitive now than when it would have made a lot more sense to jump earlier.
I don't think Clemson or FSU had any better choices at the time...SC/FL had them blocked from the SEC & the B1G wasn't ready or willing at the time for either. So you had the Big12 or ACC with the ACC looking more secure with 1/2 the Big12 potentially joining the Pac12. ND threw the ACC a bone and the ACC looked like the best choice. IF I recall correctly neither supported the GOR at the time, but both got pulled into by the conference majority.
I think the reason they didn’t jump ship is because they signed a pretty much iron clad grant of rights deal with the ACC in 2016 that runs through 2036.

So if they opt out now they would miss financial payouts from both the ACC and the conference they left for, because the ACC owns their broadcast rights until 2036.

No one is looking at the ACC for expansion, because those schools bring nothing to the table until 2036 for revenue to the league. Genius stroke on the ACC’s part, but it’s souring their member school relationships with the conference.
The GOR is what is keeping them there now, at least until the legal challenges play out. But I go back to there decision to sign the GOR. At the time it seemed like the best play they had to remain in a major conference.

Even if the GOR is beaten or reduced, it will be interesting to see there options. It seems the Big12 would be happy to take them, but I'm still not convinced long term the Big 12 is a great play with the way they seem to be selling there soul to private equity. Personally, I'm not convinced either way if the SEC or Big10 wants them long term. For SEC, they already own a team in the state & probably the preferred school long term. Add in network politics, with ESPN owning the rights to both ACC & SEC...do they really want to pay FSU/Clemson more money to move to SEC when they are trying to reduce costs. Why not keep them in the ACC at a discount. Since the B1G is in bed with everyone but ESPN, it will certainly complicate matters as long as GOR stands in some form, thinking ESPN is probably not wanting to give up the rights to FOX at a discount & I don't see the B1G offering spots unless the pie gets bigger. Throw in NBC probably likes Clemson/FSU in ACC as a possible opponent to ND.
 
#55      
FWLIW, I think the only way FSU joins the Big12 is if they don't get an invitation from the BIG. And I find that premise to be near laughable. 3 beach houses on it (Grizz's, but still).

A whole lotta BS being spewed by some pundits/cheerleaders here

Gotta agree. I'd read it would be a minimum of $120 mil for FSU to leave, and they've already tried and failed to come up with the money, clamoring that they won't be able to compete with the current league distribution.

Unfortunately, I think it's true. It will be difficult for a football team outside the SEC/BIG to compete in a world where athletes are compensated and have mobility. I think the NCAA champion will come from BIG/SEC for years and years to come.
 
#57      
FWLIW, I think the only way FSU joins the Big12 is if they don't get an invitation from the BIG. And I find that premise to be near laughable. 3 beach houses on it (Grizz's, but still).

A whole lotta BS being spewed by some pundits/cheerleaders here
Generally was 100% with you that B1G would take FSU if GOR wasn't in play; however the whole lawsuit bit and being a good partner may have some legs, then add in the questions on academic fit, & the money to get out of the GOR (I don't expect a 100% win for FSU - it is going to cost them something to leave & probably still expensive) could be enough to tip the scale where B1G isn't ready to move now, where Big12 will be a lot more flexible on the financial side.
 
#58      
I am going to make this lesson in Realignment Geopolitics simple as possible, the B1G's goal in this Florida State situation is simple, the BIG must keep FSU away from the SEC at all costs:

1. Clemson does not matter nearly as much in this situation, Florida State is the linchpin. Only worry about Clemson if FSU and them are an ironclad package deal.

2. FSU is the most important football piece in this deal. Florida State is the biggest brand (and a big brand when they were an independent) not affiliated with the "P2" and one from a high population state that is still growing. BTW to all of these conferences wanting North Carolina and Virginia first, they might be sleeping giants but Florida State's program is what you hope the other two are already. Actually what What these college Where FSU goes will influence the future movement of Clemson, Virginia/UNC (Big Ten or SEC), Miami, Va Tech, and maybe even Texas A&M.

3. One more motivation for Florida State, they feel that ESPN's suit took away their playoff spot. They would have going to a "non-ESPN conference" as at least a major league tiebreaker.

4. If Florida State somehow stays put for now, it delays the decision for a few years,

5. If Florida State goes to the Big Ten, it solidifies the B1G's place in the P2. UNC and Virginia has much better odds of going the B1G. A&M's flirting with the Big Ten will become much more intense and (unlikely) Mizzou may at least think about it. Heck Notre Dame may join the Big Ten. Also the B!G will have their choice of the other ACC programs too.

6. If Florida State ends up in the Big 12, the P3 structure is stabilized. Clemson is coming with them. The Big 12 will get a new contract that is at least 60-70% of the SEC and Big Ten's deals, heck I would not be surprised the current Big XII deal has "if we get a big brand, we get more cash per school" clause hehe. Also the Big XII is a lot less picky about adding schools like Louisville, Virginia Tech, and even Miami. Plus the addition of FSU and Clemson might kickstart the growth of any potential sleeping giants from UCF to the Texas schools to the Four Corners schools already in the conference. Bonus, it is good scenario for Illinois in which we are less likely to get kicked out.

7. If Florida State goes to the SEC, simply put

You Lose Game Over GIF by Universal Music Africa


The dominant structure of the NCAA will a P1 with the Big Ten being nothing but an off brand SEC with a some big brands based in states with demographic decline. Clemson, Virginia and UNC will pretty much go straight to the SEC at ASAP. Unless they are even stupider than I think, Aggy will not leave this SEC superconference. This new SEC, extra-fueled by ESPN greed, can successfully break away from the NCAA if they can just poach the right schools from.... the Big Ten. You really think that USC, who helped kill their old conference, will have the loyalty to stay in the Big Ten when this superconference forms. If the SEC gets Florida State and whatever other ACC schools they want, in 10 years they will be brave enough to give Ohio State and Michigan the invite to join the SEC and bye bye Big Ten. BTW when this breakaway SEC Super League is finally unless Bielema goes full Bob Zuppke in the next two decades, Illinois ain't getting invited. The old timers scream "but we have the Chicago market," the Super League already will already have Chicago market, it is called Notre Dame. If ESPN/SEC gets Florida State, Illinois fate is the Ron Guenther Plan in Fruition, being a G5 that get stomps into submission by SMU, Wake, and Texas St. Thankfully, ESPN/SEC might not realize how good of a Realignment Geopolitics position they would be if they got Florida State.
 
#59      
I am going to make this lesson in Realignment Geopolitics simple as possible, the B1G's goal in this Florida State situation is simple, the BIG must keep FSU away from the SEC at all costs:

1. Clemson does not matter nearly as much in this situation, Florida State is the linchpin. Only worry about Clemson if FSU and them are an ironclad package deal.

2. FSU is the most important football piece in this deal. Florida State is the biggest brand (and a big brand when they were an independent) not affiliated with the "P2" and one from a high population state that is still growing. BTW to all of these conferences wanting North Carolina and Virginia first, they might be sleeping giants but Florida State's program is what you hope the other two are already. Actually what What these college Where FSU goes will influence the future movement of Clemson, Virginia/UNC (Big Ten or SEC), Miami, Va Tech, and maybe even Texas A&M.

3. One more motivation for Florida State, they feel that ESPN's suit took away their playoff spot. They would have going to a "non-ESPN conference" as at least a major league tiebreaker.

4. If Florida State somehow stays put for now, it delays the decision for a few years,

5. If Florida State goes to the Big Ten, it solidifies the B1G's place in the P2. UNC and Virginia has much better odds of going the B1G. A&M's flirting with the Big Ten will become much more intense and (unlikely) Mizzou may at least think about it. Heck Notre Dame may join the Big Ten. Also the B!G will have their choice of the other ACC programs too.

6. If Florida State ends up in the Big 12, the P3 structure is stabilized. Clemson is coming with them. The Big 12 will get a new contract that is at least 60-70% of the SEC and Big Ten's deals, heck I would not be surprised the current Big XII deal has "if we get a big brand, we get more cash per school" clause hehe. Also the Big XII is a lot less picky about adding schools like Louisville, Virginia Tech, and even Miami. Plus the addition of FSU and Clemson might kickstart the growth of any potential sleeping giants from UCF to the Texas schools to the Four Corners schools already in the conference. Bonus, it is good scenario for Illinois in which we are less likely to get kicked out.

7. If Florida State goes to the SEC, simply put

You Lose Game Over GIF by Universal Music Africa


The dominant structure of the NCAA will a P1 with the Big Ten being nothing but an off brand SEC with a some big brands based in states with demographic decline. Clemson, Virginia and UNC will pretty much go straight to the SEC at ASAP. Unless they are even stupider than I think, Aggy will not leave this SEC superconference. This new SEC, extra-fueled by ESPN greed, can successfully break away from the NCAA if they can just poach the right schools from.... the Big Ten. You really think that USC, who helped kill their old conference, will have the loyalty to stay in the Big Ten when this superconference forms. If the SEC gets Florida State and whatever other ACC schools they want, in 10 years they will be brave enough to give Ohio State and Michigan the invite to join the SEC and bye bye Big Ten. BTW when this breakaway SEC Super League is finally unless Bielema goes full Bob Zuppke in the next two decades, Illinois ain't getting invited. The old timers scream "but we have the Chicago market," the Super League already will already have Chicago market, it is called Notre Dame. If ESPN/SEC gets Florida State, Illinois fate is the Ron Guenther Plan in Fruition, being a G5 that get stomps into submission by SMU, Wake, and Texas St. Thankfully, ESPN/SEC might not realize how good of a Realignment Geopolitics position they would be if they got Florida State.

Not often I agree with everything someone says in this thread but I concur 100%!
 
#60      
I am going to make this lesson in Realignment Geopolitics simple as possible, the B1G's goal in this Florida State situation is simple, the BIG must keep FSU away from the SEC at all costs:

1. Clemson does not matter nearly as much in this situation, Florida State is the linchpin. Only worry about Clemson if FSU and them are an ironclad package deal.

2. FSU is the most important football piece in this deal. Florida State is the biggest brand (and a big brand when they were an independent) not affiliated with the "P2" and one from a high population state that is still growing. BTW to all of these conferences wanting North Carolina and Virginia first, they might be sleeping giants but Florida State's program is what you hope the other two are already. Actually what What these college Where FSU goes will influence the future movement of Clemson, Virginia/UNC (Big Ten or SEC), Miami, Va Tech, and maybe even Texas A&M.

3. One more motivation for Florida State, they feel that ESPN's suit took away their playoff spot. They would have going to a "non-ESPN conference" as at least a major league tiebreaker.

4. If Florida State somehow stays put for now, it delays the decision for a few years,

5. If Florida State goes to the Big Ten, it solidifies the B1G's place in the P2. UNC and Virginia has much better odds of going the B1G. A&M's flirting with the Big Ten will become much more intense and (unlikely) Mizzou may at least think about it. Heck Notre Dame may join the Big Ten. Also the B!G will have their choice of the other ACC programs too.

6. If Florida State ends up in the Big 12, the P3 structure is stabilized. Clemson is coming with them. The Big 12 will get a new contract that is at least 60-70% of the SEC and Big Ten's deals, heck I would not be surprised the current Big XII deal has "if we get a big brand, we get more cash per school" clause hehe. Also the Big XII is a lot less picky about adding schools like Louisville, Virginia Tech, and even Miami. Plus the addition of FSU and Clemson might kickstart the growth of any potential sleeping giants from UCF to the Texas schools to the Four Corners schools already in the conference. Bonus, it is good scenario for Illinois in which we are less likely to get kicked out.

7. If Florida State goes to the SEC, simply put

You Lose Game Over GIF by Universal Music Africa


The dominant structure of the NCAA will a P1 with the Big Ten being nothing but an off brand SEC with a some big brands based in states with demographic decline. Clemson, Virginia and UNC will pretty much go straight to the SEC at ASAP. Unless they are even stupider than I think, Aggy will not leave this SEC superconference. This new SEC, extra-fueled by ESPN greed, can successfully break away from the NCAA if they can just poach the right schools from.... the Big Ten. You really think that USC, who helped kill their old conference, will have the loyalty to stay in the Big Ten when this superconference forms. If the SEC gets Florida State and whatever other ACC schools they want, in 10 years they will be brave enough to give Ohio State and Michigan the invite to join the SEC and bye bye Big Ten. BTW when this breakaway SEC Super League is finally unless Bielema goes full Bob Zuppke in the next two decades, Illinois ain't getting invited. The old timers scream "but we have the Chicago market," the Super League already will already have Chicago market, it is called Notre Dame. If ESPN/SEC gets Florida State, Illinois fate is the Ron Guenther Plan in Fruition, being a G5 that get stomps into submission by SMU, Wake, and Texas St. Thankfully, ESPN/SEC might not realize how good of a Realignment Geopolitics position they would be if they got Florida State.
This is spot on.

FSU's being excluded from the playoffs should push them to the B1G (and perhaps others from the ACC), which might bring A&M and eventually ND.

I fear that possible breakaway super league because, barring some miraculous shift in our trajectory (or someone pushing an incremental $10-15 million annually into Illinois Football to buy our way there), we are on the outside looking in.

As you stated, I don't think ESPN sees FSU as a critical player who can shift things so dramatically, or if they do, it's improbable anyone there will fund bringing them into the SEC since they won't bring a 'new' market. Regardless (at least for now), FSU wants no part of ESPN due to the playoff snub.

Anyone saying the B1G doesn't want FSU is lying or is misinformed. Their AAU status and/or legal fight with the ACC will not impact anything once they are free and clear.
 
#61      
Not often I agree with everything someone says in this thread but I concur 100%!
Been saying the same for a long time. Well done @TentakilRex

I only disagree with one point, in the last paragraph. In the P1 scenario there is no way it takes 10 years for the SEC to initiate B1G breakup procedures.
 
#62      
(I want to start by saying I absolutely agree that FSU is the best target left besides Notre Dame by a wide margin, and I am only including them below for a comparison, not to make some point that Illinois is anywhere near FSU in value, lol.)

I'll once again voice my opinion that we are WAY too hard on ourselves, and Illinois brings a lot of value to a conference. We have this perception that we are like deadweight because we have been bad in the modern era, but that seems like an - err- simplistic way to look at this. Does ANYBODY ever postulate that, for example, Michigan State would get left behind? No. Because they have earned a better image on the field because they have won more in the last 20+ years ... but this is about money. And Illinois just simply is not worlds apart from our Big Ten peers that probably don't worry about getting left behind and other schools often listed as targets, and we are a LOT further down from our ceiling than they are, IMO.

2023 TOTAL ATHLETIC REVENUE
Michigan State: $170 million
Florida State: $169 million
Iowa: $167 million
Illinois: $148 million
North Carolina: $139 million
UCLA: $105 million

2023 FOOTBALL REVENUE
Florida State: $91 million
Michigan State: $90 million
Iowa: $87 million
Illinois: $70 million
North Carolina: $67 million
UCLA: $46 million

2023 AVERAGE FOOTBALL TV RATING ON MAJOR NETWORKS*
Florida State: 4.2 million
Iowa: 2.8 million
Michigan State: 2.8 million
North Carolina: 2.2 million
Illinois: 1.9 million
UCLA: 1.8 million

* Excludes small networks that drag everyone's ratings down like Pac-12 Network and Big Ten Network ... in other words, it tries to gauge the viewers a team is getting on the networks that the big decision makers actually care about.

TO SUMMARIZE
1. Illinois still ranks toward the middle or bottom of those lists above, but fan enthusiasm (something that naturally fluctuates for all but a handful of programs) is still very low compared to what it could be. So, while you of course can't put all of your eggs in the "sleeping giant" basket, the fact remains that Illinois is sort of an anti-Iowa State ... we are not maxing out our viewership with a small state that mostly follows another team and a modestly sized alumni base because we have been good lately. Conversely, we have been terrible, and even our absolute floor of fan interest is drawing from such a large pool of potential fans that we are hanging in there with "bigger" programs that are in way healthier places. Which brings me to my next point...

2. Even if you think where we are at this very moment is sort of "meh," how can our own fans not acknowledge how much better it could be?? We've already seen another significant increase in season ticket sales this offseason, and we will play significantly more high-profile matchups next year (e.g., Nebraska on FOX, Michigan, at Oregon, etc.), and I predict our average viewer rating will go up again. I think it's entirely fair to look at us as pretty respectable (if lower than we'd like to be) as far as the money we bring in, AND acknowledge that on paper we have a lot more room to grow. How is Nebraska going to bring in more money next year? They sell out every game, and their fan base tunes in every week. I'm willing to bet a coach who had Illinois rolling would bring in revenue that starts to rival programs like that.

3. I am still not convinced that Ohio State and Michigan have this huge desire to replace Illinois with Georgia on their regular season schedules, lol. All of the professional sports leagues have "lower tier" teams that I am willing to bet the Chiefs enjoy getting to play every now and again. To the Big Ten commissioner, I'm saying Illinois is a win-win. They have the opportunity to turn into a legitimate cash cow, and for now they will pull their weight in the revenue and TV ratings department while providing my sacred cows like Michigan and OSU an easy win 9 times out of 10.
 
#63      
(I want to start by saying I absolutely agree that FSU is the best target left besides Notre Dame by a wide margin, and I am only including them below for a comparison, not to make some point that Illinois is anywhere near FSU in value, lol.)

I'll once again voice my opinion that we are WAY too hard on ourselves, and Illinois brings a lot of value to a conference. We have this perception that we are like deadweight because we have been bad in the modern era, but that seems like an - err- simplistic way to look at this. Does ANYBODY ever postulate that, for example, Michigan State would get left behind? No. Because they have earned a better image on the field because they have won more in the last 20+ years ... but this is about money. And Illinois just simply is not worlds apart from our Big Ten peers that probably don't worry about getting left behind and other schools often listed as targets, and we are a LOT further down from our ceiling than they are, IMO.
Fighter, I admire your zeal and steadfastness when it comes to the Beloved. Your willingness to pick up an Orange and Blue shield and stand the wall to defend the Illini against all comers is heroic. However (there's always a 'however' isn't there?), money is a direct result of success, of which the Beloved have had little - and not just recently. Some factoids gleaned from the Sports Reference website:

- Illinois' all time record in 132 seasons is 622-624-49, pretty much the very definition of mediocrity. However, it's skewed by the early years (prior to the Big Ten starting play in 1953), where the Illini posted a record of 296-186-33 (.574). Since 1953, we've been aiming for mediocrity and failing to achieve even that.

- Since 1953, our record is 326-443-16 (.415)
- We've only had 25 winning seasons in this 70 year time period
- We have only 3 coaches that have a winning record (Ray Eliot, Mike White, John Mackovic)
- we've only even finished in the top half of the conference standings 25 times since 1958
- We've won the conference championship only 3 times since 1958, but have finished in either last or next to last 12 times (excludes the years 2010 and later because of the divisions
- Since 2010 when the Big split into divisions, we've finished either last or next to last 5 times in the weak West

I am as excited as anyone over the path that Josh and Bret have taken with this team, I believe we are on a path to relevance. However, (there's always a "however" isn't there?) Illinois football is relevant mostly to the die hards on sites like this and others, and to alums. While we have a huge and mostly faithful alumni base, I personally think it is going to take years of consistent success to make us relevant to the rest of the college football world. The money will follow the success . . . If college athletics can survive, a topic for another thread.

Thanks for always having the Illini's backs, and for standing the wall.
 
#64      
I am going to make this lesson in Realignment Geopolitics simple as possible, the B1G's goal in this Florida State situation is simple, the BIG must keep FSU away from the SEC at all costs:

1. Clemson does not matter nearly as much in this situation, Florida State is the linchpin. Only worry about Clemson if FSU and them are an ironclad package deal.

2. FSU is the most important football piece in this deal. Florida State is the biggest brand (and a big brand when they were an independent) not affiliated with the "P2" and one from a high population state that is still growing. BTW to all of these conferences wanting North Carolina and Virginia first, they might be sleeping giants but Florida State's program is what you hope the other two are already. Actually what What these college Where FSU goes will influence the future movement of Clemson, Virginia/UNC (Big Ten or SEC), Miami, Va Tech, and maybe even Texas A&M.

3. One more motivation for Florida State, they feel that ESPN's suit took away their playoff spot. They would have going to a "non-ESPN conference" as at least a major league tiebreaker.

4. If Florida State somehow stays put for now, it delays the decision for a few years,

5. If Florida State goes to the Big Ten, it solidifies the B1G's place in the P2. UNC and Virginia has much better odds of going the B1G. A&M's flirting with the Big Ten will become much more intense and (unlikely) Mizzou may at least think about it. Heck Notre Dame may join the Big Ten. Also the B!G will have their choice of the other ACC programs too.

6. If Florida State ends up in the Big 12, the P3 structure is stabilized. Clemson is coming with them. The Big 12 will get a new contract that is at least 60-70% of the SEC and Big Ten's deals, heck I would not be surprised the current Big XII deal has "if we get a big brand, we get more cash per school" clause hehe. Also the Big XII is a lot less picky about adding schools like Louisville, Virginia Tech, and even Miami. Plus the addition of FSU and Clemson might kickstart the growth of any potential sleeping giants from UCF to the Texas schools to the Four Corners schools already in the conference. Bonus, it is good scenario for Illinois in which we are less likely to get kicked out.

7. If Florida State goes to the SEC, simply put

You Lose Game Over GIF by Universal Music Africa


The dominant structure of the NCAA will a P1 with the Big Ten being nothing but an off brand SEC with a some big brands based in states with demographic decline. Clemson, Virginia and UNC will pretty much go straight to the SEC at ASAP. Unless they are even stupider than I think, Aggy will not leave this SEC superconference. This new SEC, extra-fueled by ESPN greed, can successfully break away from the NCAA if they can just poach the right schools from.... the Big Ten. You really think that USC, who helped kill their old conference, will have the loyalty to stay in the Big Ten when this superconference forms. If the SEC gets Florida State and whatever other ACC schools they want, in 10 years they will be brave enough to give Ohio State and Michigan the invite to join the SEC and bye bye Big Ten. BTW when this breakaway SEC Super League is finally unless Bielema goes full Bob Zuppke in the next two decades, Illinois ain't getting invited. The old timers scream "but we have the Chicago market," the Super League already will already have Chicago market, it is called Notre Dame. If ESPN/SEC gets Florida State, Illinois fate is the Ron Guenther Plan in Fruition, being a G5 that get stomps into submission by SMU, Wake, and Texas St. Thankfully, ESPN/SEC might not realize how good of a Realignment Geopolitics position they would be if they got Florida State.
I think you are way overstating the value & risk of FSU because of a recent uptick. ND is still the biggest play out there, FSU had a good year and are a significant brand, but you are buying high right now. Both the B1G & SEC passed on them last go around, are they that much better now as a long term play?

I do believe they have more value to the B1G than the SEC & this is about money...I don't see them adding that much value to the SEC. If you believe in cable market size, SEC already has Florida. If you believe it is all about streaming & having big brands the SEC already has Georgia/Alabama/Texas/Florida/Oklahoma who IMO are way bigger brands than FSU, so not seeing FSU significantly tipping that scale for the SEC...if GOR stands with enough bite to keep FSU in the ACC (& I think the argument is really can we get a cheaper buyout vs. expecting the penalty to totally go away), FSU (& rest of ACC) is likely not nearly as significant when opportunity to move comes.

I also think that B1G's multiple TV partners is a nice advantage in the long term vs being tied to ESPN, by dividing the contract with several partners I much prefer the B1G's position to the SEC having are only partner in a shrinking ESPN. All this said; 1) I think FSU to the B1G is more likely from a revenue perspective; 2) I don't see the SEC being very excited about adding FSU as I don't see much value added to the SEC (still only so many Prime time spots on ESPN/ABC - does FSU warrant pulling one of the bigger brands off Prime time?) ...so if FSU doesn't really add any value to the SEC, & this is about money, I don't think FSU going to the SEC as a middle tier of the Conference brand really should scare you.
 
#65      
Fighter, I admire your zeal and steadfastness when it comes to the Beloved. Your willingness to pick up an Orange and Blue shield and stand the wall to defend the Illini against all comers is heroic. However (there's always a 'however' isn't there?), money is a direct result of success, of which the Beloved have had little - and not just recently. Some factoids gleaned from the Sports Reference website:

- Illinois' all time record in 132 seasons is 622-624-49, pretty much the very definition of mediocrity. However, it's skewed by the early years (prior to the Big Ten starting play in 1953), where the Illini posted a record of 296-186-33 (.574). Since 1953, we've been aiming for mediocrity and failing to achieve even that.

- Since 1953, our record is 326-443-16 (.415)
- We've only had 25 winning seasons in this 70 year time period
- We have only 3 coaches that have a winning record (Ray Eliot, Mike White, John Mackovic)
- we've only even finished in the top half of the conference standings 25 times since 1958
- We've won the conference championship only 3 times since 1958, but have finished in either last or next to last 12 times (excludes the years 2010 and later because of the divisions
- Since 2010 when the Big split into divisions, we've finished either last or next to last 5 times in the weak West

I am as excited as anyone over the path that Josh and Bret have taken with this team, I believe we are on a path to relevance. However, (there's always a "however" isn't there?) Illinois football is relevant mostly to the die hards on sites like this and others, and to alums. While we have a huge and mostly faithful alumni base, I personally think it is going to take years of consistent success to make us relevant to the rest of the college football world. The money will follow the success . . . If college athletics can survive, a topic for another thread.

Thanks for always having the Illini's backs, and for standing the wall.
And FWIW, I don't really even think we disagree. The common truth here is that by being so bad for so long and alienating potential fans, Illinois has significantly decreased its value and attractiveness. I am merely suggesting that due to factors we are LUCKY exist (e.g., good recruiting footprint, huge alumni base, shockingly capable donor pools given how bad we have been, large instate population, etc.), we have fallen from a very high ceiling and thus have a relatively low floor. In other words, we are pretty much at our worst right now as far as "brand value" ... and we are still similar to a program like North Carolina and UCLA. While I would NEVER suggest the task in front of Bielema is an easy one, I do think that a coach who can achieve the level of success seen at programs like Iowa, Wisconsin or even Minnesota would put us in a position where we really are a "big money" program. And there are programs out there that could win, win, win and still not be that much of a cash cow (e.g., Wake Forest).

So, all I am saying is that we should all be thankful that our "bad" is not as bad as many other programs, and our ceiling remains pretty damn high (even if reaching that ceiling is very, very difficult in the near term). Alas, if conferences were playing musical chairs in the late 1980s, would anyone seriously doubt that Illinois would have been a major coup, selling out Memorial Stadium every week??
 
#66      
I think you are way overstating the value & risk of FSU because of a recent uptick. ND is still the biggest play out there, FSU had a good year and are a significant brand, but you are buying high right now. Both the B1G & SEC passed on them last go around, are they that much better now as a long term play?

I do believe they have more value to the B1G than the SEC & this is about money...I don't see them adding that much value to the SEC. If you believe in cable market size, SEC already has Florida. If you believe it is all about streaming & having big brands the SEC already has Georgia/Alabama/Texas/Florida/Oklahoma who IMO are way bigger brands than FSU, so not seeing FSU significantly tipping that scale for the SEC...if GOR stands with enough bite to keep FSU in the ACC (& I think the argument is really can we get a cheaper buyout vs. expecting the penalty to totally go away), FSU (& rest of ACC) is likely not nearly as significant when opportunity to move comes.

I also think that B1G's multiple TV partners is a nice advantage in the long term vs being tied to ESPN, by dividing the contract with several partners I much prefer the B1G's position to the SEC having are only partner in a shrinking ESPN. All this said; 1) I think FSU to the B1G is more likely from a revenue perspective; 2) I don't see the SEC being very excited about adding FSU as I don't see much value added to the SEC (still only so many Prime time spots on ESPN/ABC - does FSU warrant pulling one of the bigger brands off Prime time?) ...so if FSU doesn't really add any value to the SEC, & this is about money, I don't think FSU going to the SEC as a middle tier of the Conference brand really should scare you.
there is about zero chance FSU ever comes in alone ala Penn St or Nebby
I dont think Clemson moves the needle enough to excite B1G/Fox/NBC enough to underwrite it

Now, if ND or Texas A&M wanted to come in with them, maybe FSU gets in
but I dont think think this FSU thing is on anyone list of things to pursue in the next year
 
#67      
there is about zero chance FSU ever comes in alone ala Penn St or Nebby
I dont think Clemson moves the needle enough to excite B1G/Fox/NBC enough to underwrite it

Now, if ND or Texas A&M wanted to come in with them, maybe FSU gets in
but I dont think think this FSU thing is on anyone list of things to pursue in the next year
North Carolina and FSU would be the most sought after ACC pair. ND is the silliest, no-brainer of all time, of course. Bunch of hurt butts dating back a century now.
 
#70      
It will be interesting for ND, with USC's added travel schedule & adding potential games with Michigan/Ohio state/PSU to the schedule, I can see why they won't need ND as a rival. B1G pushing 9 conference games is an additional pressure on ND schedule. Add in Stanford joining the ACC & how that interacts with ND's 6 games or so with their current ACC deal (imagine the ACC/Stanford can work through that one though)... ND may start feeling the schedule pinch again.
 
#71      
It will be interesting for ND, with USC's added travel schedule & adding potential games with Michigan/Ohio state/PSU to the schedule, I can see why they won't need ND as a rival. B1G pushing 9 conference games is an additional pressure on ND schedule. Add in Stanford joining the ACC & how that interacts with ND's 6 games or so with their current ACC deal (imagine the ACC/Stanford can work through that one though)... ND may start feeling the schedule pinch again.

exactly. ND's resolve very well may start crumbling (if their schedule is seen as second rate). if the worm turns, this may create an avenue for Stanford (as ND's entry partner). for sure though, this a longer term play than 19/20.
 
#72      
exactly. ND's resolve very well may start crumbling (if their schedule is seen as second rate). if the worm turns, this may create an avenue for Stanford (as ND's entry partner). for sure though, this a longer term play than 19/20.
maybe on Stanford, but it would probably take all of ND's leverage to pull off that one...I don't think the b1G has any interest in adding anymore Pacific coast teams, I think the current 4 will fill more than enough late night time slots. Plus Stanford has now tied themselves to the same GOR as FSU/NC and the rest of the ACC. If Stanford is available, so are quite a few other teams that would look much better. Maybe even Texas A&M would open up.
 
#74      
maybe on Stanford, but it would probably take all of ND's leverage to pull off that one...I don't think the b1G has any interest in adding anymore Pacific coast teams, I think the current 4 will fill more than enough late night time slots. Plus Stanford has now tied themselves to the same GOR as FSU/NC and the rest of the ACC. If Stanford is available, so are quite a few other teams that would look much better. Maybe even Texas A&M would open up.

I think A&M has a decent probability of being paired with FSU (don't underestimate their hatred of the 'Horns, lol)
 
#75      
if Stanford had any value , we would have added them already .

FSU is likely going thru the AAU application process in response to suggestions by the B1G commish.

long term , my money is 2 or 4 of the following
ND
NC
A&M
FSU

all of those schools are quite likely additive , financially . or at worst, break even . but we are likely 2-3 years away
 
Back