Did anybody watch?yup
its all about TV.
with no CC, no one will watch
Did anybody watch?yup
its all about TV.
with no CC, no one will watch
How in the world did I forget about Leon Marchand??!!Obviously can't forget about McIntosh and Marchand...head and shoulders above as the def. the top two biggest swimming stars these games IMO.
Did anybody watch?
The 200m breastroke and the two IMs were the ones where you could just hear it...How in the world did I forget about Leon Marchand??!!
Yes, he was phenomenal. But for me, the energy in the swimming venue (normally a rugby stadium) might have been even more of a memory than his performances. I'm not sure any Paris Olympics venue was as amped up (sorry, the word "electric" has become cliche now that Travis Kelce has overtaken that word) more than the La Defense Arena when Marchand was competing.
I don't recall a single poster saying they would struggle. The singular point EVERYONE was making was that it was a missed opportunity to further Publicize/grow the sport here in the U.S. I'll give you my very own personal example...... I did not watch one single minute of the U.S. Womens (nor any other countries) Olympic basketball games, NOT 1. Had Caitlyn Clark played, I'd have watched several of the U.S. games. And I watched a LOT of the Olympics!Gee, the U.S. women's hoops team really struggled in this tournament without Caitlin Clark.
I don't recall a single poster saying they would struggle. The singular point EVERYONE was making was that it was a missed opportunity to further Publicize/grow the sport here in the U.S. I'll give you my very own personal example...... I did not watch one single minute of the U.S. Womens (nor any other countries) Olympic basketball games, NOT 1. Had Caitlyn Clark played, I'd have watched several of the U.S. games. And I watched a LOT of the Olympics!
Maybe not for you, but sure seems it would have for a good number of fans.And I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that Caitlin Clark being in it would have made no change in how much I watched any of it.
Even the facts won't discourage some folks. There are even people who were involved in selecting the team that say they were wrong. Those numbers ^^^^ you posted. I think if someone were to do the work, you could take picks 2-10 and add up the attendance improvements in their games (excluding the CC games of course) and they wouldn't come near what C Clark brought to the league.Maybe not for you, but sure seems it would have for a good number of fans.
“So far this season, 16 WNBA games have topped 1 million viewers. Clark's Indiana Fever were featured in 14 of those games.”
https://www.si.com/wnba/caitlin-clark-effect-wnba-all-star-game-ratings#:~:text=So far this season, 16,watched WNBA of the season.
“When Clark plays, WNBA games average 15,591 fans in attendance (+105%) compared to 7,645 fans when she is not in action. Indiana Fever average 36% more fans on the road (15,142) than any other WNBA team.”
https://www.wishtv.com/sports/indiana-fever/report-wnba-attendance-is-105-higher-when-caitlin-clark-plays/#:~:text=When Clark plays, WNBA games,than any other WNBA team.
They struggled because they allowed a group of jealous players, on their last legs as professionals, push the health of their league to the back burner. They had the opportunity to put the most popular player in this country, and the face of the league, on a world stage and blew it. For what? So Taurasi's feelings wouldn't be hurt? Clark and Reese should have been on that team, plain and simple. They kept the league's best playmaker at the PG position and the league's best rebounder off of the team for no reason. The WNBA All Stars beat the brakes off of the Olympic team. It was just a fumble by the selection group.Gee, the U.S. women's hoops team really struggled in this tournament without Caitlin Clark.
Maybe not for you, but sure seems it would have for a good number of fans.
“So far this season, 16 WNBA games have topped 1 million viewers. Clark's Indiana Fever were featured in 14 of those games.”
https://www.si.com/wnba/caitlin-clark-effect-wnba-all-star-game-ratings#:~:text=So far this season, 16,watched WNBA of the season.
“When Clark plays, WNBA games average 15,591 fans in attendance (+105%) compared to 7,645 fans when she is not in action. Indiana Fever average 36% more fans on the road (15,142) than any other WNBA team.”
https://www.wishtv.com/sports/indiana-fever/report-wnba-attendance-is-105-higher-when-caitlin-clark-plays/#:~:text=When Clark plays, WNBA games,than any other WNBA team.
I think it was a pretty weak performance by U.S. swim team (since watching from 1964) , especially men. No answer for Marchand. Good for him! And that McIntosh! Yikes. Good for her!
Even the facts won't discourage some folks. There are even people who were involved in selecting the team that say they were wrong. Those numbers ^^^^ you posted. I think if someone were to do the work, you could take picks 2-10 and add up the attendance improvements in their games (excluding the CC games of course) and they wouldn't come near what C Clark brought to the league.
They struggled because they allowed a group of jealous players, on their last legs as professionals, push the health of their league to the back burner. They had the opportunity to put the most popular player in this country, and the face of the league, on a world stage and blew it. For what? So Taurasi's feelings wouldn't be hurt? Clark and Reese should have been on that team, plain and simple. They kept the league's best playmaker at the PG position and the league's best rebounder off of the team for no reason. The WNBA All Stars beat the brakes off of the Olympic team. It was just a fumble by the selection group.
the legend says yes...The U.S. wins more gold medals in swimming than their fiercest rival, Australia, and it's somehow a disappointment???
Why do you keep tossing about comments like this? Nobody said that.But sure, Caitlin was the missing piece.
I, and probably most every other fan brought to womens basketball during C. Clarks rise, (what the past 3 years maybe?), likely have no idea who Stewart is. Again, another comment pulled out of thin air that has nothing to do with the conversation. Leaving CC off the Olympic team was a missed opportunity, pretty simple.The last person younger than Clark is now when they played in the Olympics was Breanna Stewart back in 2016, who wouldn't turn 22 until after the tournament. Though I'm sure Stewart's inclusion was just about drawing more eyeballs to the WNBA, amirite?
Staley didn't say CC would be on the team, she said the equivalent of "Given new/different information, we would consider different conclusions", which is exactly as it should be. But the argument against CC was that when the team was supposed to be training and doing exhibitions together, it hadn't "clicked" yet for CC, so she wasn't ready. It might have only been a week off, but when it's close, go with the proven commodity.Why do you keep tossing about comments like this? Nobody said that.
I, and probably most every other fan brought to womens basketball during C. Clarks rise, (what the past 3 years maybe?), likely have no idea who Stewart is. Again, another comment pulled out of thin air that has nothing to do with the conversation. Leaving CC off the Olympic team was a missed opportunity, pretty simple.
For some reason you seem hellbent on changing the narrative into something other than that.
Phelps carried the US men's swim team for the previous 4 Olympics. Time for someone new to step up. Not sure who it will be.I think it was a pretty weak performance by U.S. swim team (since watching from 1964) , especially men. No answer for Marchand. Good for him! And that McIntosh! Yikes. Good for her!
Clark, like Taytum, would not have played. Their time is coming.A point that everyone was making? You sure about that? I know there were multiple posters on here, including myself, who brought up the point that it's about putting the best team on the court, not the one that can get you the most social media clicks.
I also didn't watch any of the Olympic women's basketball tournament either up until the gold medal game but it's not for lack of wanting to. Most of the games were taking place while I was at work or I had other stuff going on. And I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that Caitlin Clark being in it would have made no change in how much I watched any of it.
He's talking about the men's performance.the legend says yes...
Humorous (or maybe sad) side note I saw brought about by Katie’s great performances. After winning her first gold, the ACC tweeted out congratulations to her and claiming her for its own despite her having left Stanford well before it joined the ACC. Not sure what the response to that was from Stanford fans or fans of teams that left conference, but members of the Pac (1)2 were not very pleased. Too funny.Katie Ledecky for President!
Phelps is a freak of nature GOAT. The Michael Jordan of his sport. This will have to be done by committee going forward. The stars of the men's team are aging. They need some young blood to replace them.Phelps carried the US men's swim team for the previous 4 Olympics. Time for someone new to step up. Not sure who it will be.
He wants to die on that hill, refuting an argument no one is making. Say misleading things enough and maybe they become the 'truth'.Why do you keep tossing about comments like this? Nobody said that.
I, and probably most every other fan brought to womens basketball during C. Clarks rise, (what the past 3 years maybe?), likely have no idea who Stewart is. Again, another comment pulled out of thin air that has nothing to do with the conversation. Leaving CC off the Olympic team was a missed opportunity, pretty simple.
For some reason you seem hellbent on changing the narrative into something other than that.