Yes, Shannon…as this video says, “…God made you different!” And I am in awe of you!
The one to charge them would be the DA that just had them offer the details up for this case. If they were serious about defending sexual assualt victims, they wouldn't dare then go after a victim for things that happened in the course of the events. A fake ID is significantly less serious than a sexual assault. That would set a terrible precident that you have to have behaved perfectly prior to an alleged assault to ever come forward.Question for the attorneys here: will the accuser or her friend face any legal consequences for the crimes they admitted to during the course of this trial? or is there some kind of immunity they receive from this or something? Off the top of my head, they admitted to 1) possessing a fake id, 2) underage drinking, 3) driving while intoxicated, 4) possible perjury (changing their statements throughout the course of the trial while under oath)?
Additionally, this DA specifically would never prosecute.The one to charge them would be the DA that just had them offer the details up for this case. If they were serious about defending sexual assualt victims, they wouldn't dare then go after a victim for things that happened in the course of the events. A fake ID is significantly less serious than a sexual assault. That would set a terrible precident that you have to have behaved perfectly prior to an alleged assault to ever come forward.
Also, let's try to be careful on trying to pile on the alleged victim. It's still reasonable to believe she was assaulted that night, just not by TSJ. The only ones to pile on is the DA for even charging the case with such flimsy evidence, and perhaps the detectives for not doing their level best to investigate. Wishing that the victim be punished for every little thing is just petty when viewed through the lens of an assault victim that happened to misidentify her attacker and a vindictive DA that ran with the narrative that a famous basketball player must have done it because he's an entitled superstar
This is a tremendous post. Clearly it is possible the accuser was assaulted that night. The DA in this case? That is another matter. I pay taxes in my home state and I would hope our DA’s do their homework and look at obvious things such as Morris’ presence?The one to charge them would be the DA that just had them offer the details up for this case. If they were serious about defending sexual assualt victims, they wouldn't dare then go after a victim for things that happened in the course of the events. A fake ID is significantly less serious than a sexual assault. That would set a terrible precident that you have to have behaved perfectly prior to an alleged assault to ever come forward.
Also, let's try to be careful on trying to pile on the alleged victim. It's still reasonable to believe she was assaulted that night, just not by TSJ. The only ones to pile on is the DA for even charging the case with such flimsy evidence, and perhaps the detectives for not doing their level best to investigate. Wishing that the victim be punished for every little thing is just petty when viewed through the lens of an assault victim that happened to misidentify her attacker and a vindictive DA that ran with the narrative that a famous basketball player must have done it because he's an entitled superstar
He is 100% innocent. This never should have went to trial. There is not even .01% chance he did this. She did this for money. That was all.It's pretty clear that those who responded negatively to my post greatly misunderstand me and/or what I'm trying to say. I know from experience that I tend to hedge on things that most people are comfortable saying they're "100%" certain about. And I wasn't talking about legal innocence or whether I'm convinced of reasonable doubt (that's a completely different threshold on the other end of the scale). Of course he's 100% innocent in the eyes of the law, and based on what I know, if I had been on the jury, I would have voted not-guilty without hesitation. I'm merely hedging that sliver of uncertainty regarding a possible incident about which I have no first hand knowledge and some third hand knowledge of the trial/evidence. If you don't like thinking that way, that's fine, just move on or respond respectfully please.
The irony about attacking me for that tendency to hedge is that, as many here have agreed, we prefer a system where many guilty people go free rather than 1 innocent person is convicted. So people like me, who are less inclined to feel 100% convinced of something, would be more likely to vote "not guilty" if serving on a jury. And people who think this way are less likely to hurl insults at someone based on accusations or charges alone.
You could have just asked them to bet on it, as a bunch of ISU players were busted for gambling. They got off on a technicality related to Iowa's version of the state bureau of investigation not properly obtaining a warrant before getting cell phone data as evidence.This is a tremendous post. Clearly it is possible the accuser was assaulted that night. The DA in this case? That is another matter. I pay taxes in my home state and I would hope our DA’s do their homework and look at obvious things such as Morris’ presence?
I was at TD garden listening to ISU fans chant rapist, almost got into an altercation with one of them. Things are just not fair, the legal system takes time, and unfortunately in todays society we won’t allow that prior to passing judgement.
I know this has been stated already but the "die is cast" is why there is a need for The Innocence Project..Could the DA have dropped either or both charges before the trial?
Or is that one of those "sorry, can't stop now, the die is cast" moments?
If you understand one thing about our actual criminal justice system, understand that it is a system of plea bargaining, it is not a system of trials.Is this something that would sometimes be brought up? Like if I’m the defense I’m telling the jury, the DA offered my client no jail time to admit guilt. If she actually thought he was guilty, do you think she’d offer him the option to walk at all?
The one to charge them would be the DA that just had them offer the details up for this case. If they were serious about defending sexual assualt victims, they wouldn't dare then go after a victim for things that happened in the course of the events. A fake ID is significantly less serious than a sexual assault. That would set a terrible precident that you have to have behaved perfectly prior to an alleged assault to ever come forward.
Also, let's try to be careful on trying to pile on the alleged victim. It's still reasonable to believe she was assaulted that night, just not by TSJ. The only ones to pile on is the DA for even charging the case with such flimsy evidence, and perhaps the detectives for not doing their level best to investigate. Wishing that the victim be punished for every little thing is just petty when viewed through the lens of an assault victim that happened to misidentify her attacker and a vindictive DA that ran with the narrative that a famous basketball player must have done it because he's an entitled superstar
Yeah, this isn't new information. Her track record has been brought up and talked about since we heard about the charges. I would hope she is not re-elected.Did a internet search on the DA Suzanne Valdez and briefly fell into a rabbit hole, this ain't her first rodeo ride of shame....
![]()
Hearing panel recommends Douglas County DA receive censure in disciplinary complaint case
A panel of attorneys have released their final report on a complaint against the Douglas County district attorney, and they're recommending she receive a public censure.lawrencekstimes.com
Or not so perverse
View attachment 35431
Again, offering plea deals is absolutely 100% universal in criminal law, from driving school to keep it off your insurance record for a speeding ticket, to avoiding the death penalty in cold blooded murder. From cases with no evidence to cases that literally have the person on camera committing the act.This tactic to get a conviction when they shouldve had a good idea that he wasnt guilty is just gross.