Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#127      
Happy for Coleman. In terms of K State, they will either be a top 10 team or make the NIT and I have no clue which one will happen.
Some interesting takes on the K state blog. Generally favorable but a couple question how a contract this big could possibly affect the team dynamic (jealousy, unrealistic expectations, etc), which is something I never really considered with major NIL discrepancies among young, college players.
 
#131      
Coleman got right at $2 million with the possibility to get even more ...

Super League Money GIF by Anderson .Paak
Black And White Wow GIF by Laff
 
#133      
Of all the places Coleman could have gone, KSU is A-okay with me. He already ruled out Big Ten schools and Mizzou (because he's an Illini for life!), but I'm personally glad he isn't at some unlikable Blue Blood or even a non-Big Ten school we have some historical animosity/baggage with like Arizona, Auburn, Houston, etc.
Plus we can root for him to own Hunter for the rest of his "beat down by Illini" career.
 
#136      
My hope for Coleman is that he has a breakthrough year, beats Hunter three times and establishes himself as a first round draft pick without having to play Illinois on our way to the national championship.

However… I’m concerned that he excels primarily as a role player. For four years I was waiting for him to become an alpha, but he just never go there. He had a great season last year because he had two teammates who carried the scoring load, allowing him to become an effective catch-and-shoot three point assassin and top notch glue guy. But the year before, when the offensive flow was a mess, he had bad habits that held him back (step back threes, for example). He’s never been effective on the drive so his expertise comes from proper spacing. I know very little about what K-State’s roster excels at, so it’ll be something to keep an eye on.

Should Coleman shoot at the level he did last year, develop a stronger inside game and defend the 4 as we know he can, he’ll do well. But it’s really going to come down to who he’s surrounded by.
 
#138      
Happy for Coleman. In terms of K State, they will either be a top 10 team or make the NIT and I have no clue which one will happen.
The only thing that makes me cringe is if they're expecting him to be a top 2 scoring option. Hawk is a great utlityman. I know he had his knee bothering him, but he arguably struggled to be a consistent 3rd option for us this year...

1718393520328.png


@RabidDawgClassic just saw your similar point. Great minds..
 
#139      
The only thing that makes me cringe is if they're expecting him to be a top 2 scoring option. Hawk is a great utlityman. I know he had his knee bothering him, but he arguably struggled to be a consistent 3rd option for us this year...

View attachment 35434

@RabidDawgClassic just saw your similar point. Great minds..
He also had Terrance and Marcus, so he didn't need to score as much. He definitely has his moments. He scored at all levels in his 30 point game against Iowa.
 
#142      
He also had Terrance and Marcus, so he didn't need to score as much. He definitely has his moments. He scored at all levels in his 30 point game against Iowa.
2nd half season he started driving to the hoop and scoring. There were flashes of a 18 ppg scorer. Brad 5 out offense left the lane wide open for these drives. A traditional 5 in the low post would limit Coleman's ability to score this way. Looks like KSU likes to play bigs inside.

Kaluma is 6'7 225 15 ppg 7 rbg - in portal may not return
McNair 6'11'' 265 8 ppg 4 rbg
N'Guessman 6'9 220 8 ppg 7 rbg
Onyesnso 7' 230 KY transfer portal 4 ppg 5 rbg 3 bpg


KSU lost 6 and gained 8 from portal so similar turnover to Illinois
 
#143      
My hope for Coleman is that he has a breakthrough year, beats Hunter three times and establishes himself as a first round draft pick without having to play Illinois on our way to the national championship.

However… I’m concerned that he excels primarily as a role player. For four years I was waiting for him to become an alpha, but he just never go there. He had a great season last year because he had two teammates who carried the scoring load, allowing him to become an effective catch-and-shoot three point assassin and top notch glue guy. But the year before, when the offensive flow was a mess, he had bad habits that held him back (step back threes, for example). He’s never been effective on the drive so his expertise comes from proper spacing. I know very little about what K-State’s roster excels at, so it’ll be something to keep an eye on.

Should Coleman shoot at the level he did last year, develop a stronger inside game and defend the 4 as we know he can, he’ll do well. But it’s really going to come down to who he’s surrounded by.
You can't really call someone that plays 38 minutes a game a role player. I think you meant he was a "glue guy" which is an important role on a winning team. Don't forget he got a triple double one game, how often has that happened at Illinois? I think Ayo did it but can't think of anybody else. Coleman was much more than a role player, especially this year, he just wasn't an Alpha on scoring...
 
#145      
I'm happy for Coleman and look forward to seeing him play against Hunter a couple more times. Meanwhile, when are you going to share your thoughts about TSJ and the case now that he's been exonerated. Inquiring minds want to know...
 
#146      
You can't really call someone that plays 38 minutes a game a role player. I think you meant he was a "glue guy" which is an important role on a winning team. Don't forget he got a triple double one game, how often has that happened at Illinois? I think Ayo did it but can't think of anybody else. Coleman was much more than a role player, especially this year, he just wasn't an Alpha on scoring...
1718397818178.png

Didn't you watch me in NCAA tourney???? By the way Coleman triple double was in 2022 vs Syracuse.
 
#147      
You can't really call someone that plays 38 minutes a game a role player. I think you meant he was a "glue guy" which is an important role on a winning team. Don't forget he got a triple double one game, how often has that happened at Illinois? I think Ayo did it but can't think of anybody else. Coleman was much more than a role player, especially this year, he just wasn't an Alpha on scoring...
Actually, I guess you did mention the "glue" but the main thing you're overlooking is how much Brad played him because he was so versatile. That was also the case the year before, Brad trusted him more than anybody. And don't forget, he had knee tendinitis all year. Other than the 3 games he rested early in the year, he played close to 40 minutes every game.
 
#148      
You're right...It was Domask this year, but at least he did have one, even if it was a year ealier. And scoring is by far not the only thing Coleman brings to the table.
 
#149      
My hope for Coleman is that he has a breakthrough year, beats Hunter three times and establishes himself as a first round draft pick without having to play Illinois on our way to the national championship.

However… I’m concerned that he excels primarily as a role player. For four years I was waiting for him to become an alpha, but he just never go there. He had a great season last year because he had two teammates who carried the scoring load, allowing him to become an effective catch-and-shoot three point assassin and top notch glue guy. But the year before, when the offensive flow was a mess, he had bad habits that held him back (step back threes, for example). He’s never been effective on the drive so his expertise comes from proper spacing. I know very little about what K-State’s roster excels at, so it’ll be something to keep an eye on.

Should Coleman shoot at the level he did last year, develop a stronger inside game and defend the 4 as we know he can, he’ll do well. But it’s really going to come down to who he’s surrounded by.
He is not likely to ever be a 20 point a game guy. That’s not why he’s a good basketball player.
He gives you an incredible amount of flexibility on both ends of the court. He is about as close to being positionless as you can get.
I consider him a facilitator. Not necessarily in the typical sense, like a PG who sets the table for others. (though he can do a bit of that) He creates mismatches that create opportunities for others. He’s a facilitator, in that his presence on the court allows his coach a great deal of flexibility in matchups and scheme. He gives the coach the ability to switch and sub in patterns he may not be able to without a guy like him.
Glad he ended up with a good coach at a good program & got a life changing payday in the process.
 
#150      
That kid might have been the best player on the USA team. Just seemed rock solid and steady. Had assumed we were not in the conversation for him but i hadn't considered the O factor.
anime-big-o.gif

(deep cut)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back