sacraig
- The desert
No, @Indy Illini Fan is Josh.See, I always thought Indy was Tyler.
No, @Indy Illini Fan is Josh.See, I always thought Indy was Tyler.
I'm guessing it's whoever wants to commit first. They're both likely 1st round talents.Is the consensus Catchings over Riley? Riley is 5 months younger, seems to be a walking bucket and didn't just walk away from another B10 program after getting on campus.
Separately does this say anything about Ty & Tre's offseason that they're willing to make playing commitments Painter (supposedly) was not at the 2/3?
Catchings has visited us (though quite a while ago) as Riley obviously has. No guarantee we'll get either, but we're very very much in the game.Maybe is being more judicious with posting links to players, but during most of this process those guys have just meant we have interest not that they are likely let alone imminent. Not sure where that list of targets went to but it was pretty long and most of them never even visited. So I’m not getting excited about Catchings.
Not that it means anything, but I’d take Riley over Catchings. The way the former shoots, I’d guess Brad would too.
it also could press Coleman into a destination he previously said he would never do?Since all these UConn players get thirty days to pick a new school, that
could really put a damper on Coleman's chances of securing a pay day.
She was right, it did mean Lots of Love. Especially in letter writing and cards. The internet changed that meaning.My business partner once told me they discovered his mother-in-law was sending sympathy cards to friends that had just lost a loved one. She was signing them with "LOL". She thought is meant "Lots of Love".
We’re definitely in the game on Riley. Catchings maybe. Everybody acts like something is imminent and starts penciling in a player when Indy links a player. I could be wrong, but I don’t think that is Indy’s intent. More a “here’s someone Brad and staff like so worth keeping an eye on.” Maybe in this case it’s different since late in the game. Not saying Catchings doesn’t have interest or that he doesn’t end up here, just slow the boat some.Catchings has visited us (though quite a while ago) as Riley obviously has. No guarantee we'll get either, but we're very very much in the game.
I agree that Riley would likely have more of an immediate impact because his offensive skills are so advanced. But Catchings is a superb athlete who lots of observers predict 1st round in 2025.
Of course. It's never a good idea to pencil in a player we're recruiting, even if things look positive. We're not the only school after these guys and recruiting is always a war.We’re definitely in the game on Riley. Catchings maybe. Everybody acts like something is imminent and starts penciling in a player when Indy links a player. I could be wrong, but I don’t think that is Indy’s intent. More a “here’s someone Brad and staff like so worth keeping an eye on.” Maybe in this case it’s different since late in the game. Not saying Catchings doesn’t have interest or that he doesn’t end up here, just slow the boat some.
I’d certainly take either him or Riley, I just prefer Riley. Seems to fit better for what we need.
Same with my mother-in-law. She would send messages to the grandkids. 'So proud of you, LOL!'My business partner once told me they discovered his mother-in-law was sending sympathy cards to friends that had just lost a loved one. She was signing them with "LOL". She thought is meant "Lots of Love".
No, your mother in law knew exactly what LOL meant. She was just throwing some major shade.Same with my mother-in-law. She would send messages to the grandkids. 'So proud of you, LOL!'
and 'Congratulations on your latest achievement! LOL!"
Thought she was in on the lingo.
Be sure to use a pencil and not a sharpie, you'll be fineOf course. It's never a good idea to pencil in a player we're recruiting, even if things look positive. We're not the only school after these guys and recruiting is always a war.
Well Geoff isnt in the photo, so I assume he had nothing to do with the recruitment and should be fired.
Just Kwa, Brad, OA, & @illini0440
View attachment 35247
Riley seems to be a much better shooter than Catchings at this stage- so for that alone I would think he would be the preferred playerIs the consensus Catchings over Riley? Riley is 5 months younger, seems to be a walking bucket and didn't just walk away from another B10 program after getting on campus.
Separately does this say anything about Ty & Tre's offseason that they're willing to make playing commitments Painter (supposedly) was not at the 2/3?
has entered the chat....Same with my mother-in-law. She would send messages to the grandkids. 'So proud of you, LOL!'
and 'Congratulations on your latest achievement! LOL!"
Thought she was in on the lingo.
FWIW in their playing days Antigua was listed at 6'7 and Underwood at 6'4.How tall is OA?
FWIW in their playing days Antigua was listed at 6'7 and Underwood at 6'4.
You say of course and yet we have numerous people creating starting lineups and dolling out minutes the second a name is dropped. Not to mention getting upset with our insiders if players don't sign as if it's their fault. Rinse and repeat every single year. Restraint, unfortunately, is not Loyalty's vibe.Of course. It's never a good idea to pencil in a player we're recruiting, even if things look positive. We're not the only school after these guys and recruiting is always a war.