Illinois 112, Eastern Illinois 67 Postgame

#103      
Ok after looking at the box score I take back everything I said about Ty’s decision to redshirt. Can’t imagine he plays more than a few minutes a game with this roster
 
#106      
Will Riley absorbing all of Ty’s minutes will be a net positive for this team.

In a similar but different way, reminds me off Jens Kujawa not returning for the 89 Illini season (his senior year) unleashing the run/jump offensive game of the Flying Illini. Lowell took over his starting spot and his minutes were absorbed by much better offensive players (mostly Lowell and Marcus Liberty).

Not the same team in 1989 if Jens had stayed and started (28/33 games) and played more minutes than Lowell (22 vs. 19) like he did the prior season. Probably paid a defensive price in both cases, but overall net positive.
 
#107      
Have not watched game yet, but not going to get overly excited about individual performances — though highlights of Will are impressive. Team beat EIU just like we expect them too. They just don’t have the manpower or offensive players to keep up with Illini. Happy with the win. Hopefully it is first of many this year.

I think this is going to be a very fun and frustrating team to watch. We are going to see some impressive offensive runs/games and, and I think we lose to a couple of teams we expected to beat. Hopefully it all leads to a late run in the tourney.
From the look at of all the weapons in last night's game the Illini seem well situated to beat the teams they are expected to beat.
 
#108      
Like, seriously...why do we keep saying 17?

I could swear every single place had him at 18 when he committed. Him being 18 was the prime factor in the reclass in the first place.
I think people assume he is 17 because he reclassified and finished HS a year early. However Canada has essentially a K-13 system so even with the reclass he is the same age as most freshman from the US.
 
#109      
From the look at of all the weapons in last night's game the Illini seem well situated to beat the teams they are expected to beat.
I’m not talking about the EIUs or MD-Eastern Shores. I’m talking about teams in the mid and lower portions of the BIG when the talent disparities aren’t as large and those teams have the physical tools to play tough D. We had the same weapons against Ole Miss. You can chalk up something like Riley’s 2-8 shooting and looking a bit frustrated and loose with his dribble against Ole Miss to first “game” and on the road. I’d say it had more to do with playing a good P4 team who could play D.

We have some stinkers each year when we lose to a team(s) we shouldn’t. I don’t expect this year to be different with the relative youth and inexperience playing together — despite the weapons.
 
#110      
Giorgi was such a gem in the rough. He and Andres were incredible finds and I miss them both.
Not to mention that Giorgi pulled an all-time unselfish move that may never be seen again in NCAA basketball when he lost his starting gig, and rather than transfer, stayed and helped train up his replacement. Illini legend.
 
#111      
At first I was like: That. Was. Awesome.

Then I was like: Yeah but it was EIU.

But then I was like: True but 112 points in 40 minutes is a lot no matter who you're playing.

The defense is going to be a work in progress for a while but I thought the offensive execution was night and day compared to Ole Miss. Really fun to watch when we space the floor and move the ball around.
 
#113      
Great offensive performance obviously. But what had me most encouraged was the defensive bite the group of frosh/sophs showed in the mid to late second half. Think it was Morez, Booth, Will, DGL and Kasparas maybe? At a minimum it looked like they gave a **** on that end of the floor up 35. And you can do a lot with players who give a **** defensively.
 
#115      
Like, seriously...why do we keep saying 17?

I could swear every single place had him at 18 when he committed. Him being 18 was the prime factor in the reclass in the first place.

It was either flashed on screen or said by a student commentator during broadcast.
 
#116      
I think people assume he is 17 because he reclassified and finished HS a year early. However Canada has essentially a K-13 system so even with the reclass he is the same age as most freshman from the US.
The broadcast yesterday said he was 17
 
#117      
My feeling when arguing over whether the dude who just hung 31 in his first place ever college game...

bluey-unicorse.gif
 
#118      
In a similar but different way, reminds me off Jens Kujawa not returning for the 89 Illini season (his senior year) unleashing the run/jump offensive game of the Flying Illini. Lowell took over his starting spot and his minutes were absorbed by much better offensive players (mostly Lowell and Marcus Liberty).

Not the same team in 1989 if Jens had stayed and started (28/33 games) and played more minutes than Lowell (22 vs. 19) like he did the prior season. Probably paid a defensive price in both cases, but overall net positive.
Jens paid a physical price for playing more minutes than Lowell that year. Like Pizza Hut parking lot price.
 
#119      
In a similar but different way, reminds me off Jens Kujawa not returning for the 89 Illini season (his senior year) unleashing the run/jump offensive game of the Flying Illini. Lowell took over his starting spot and his minutes were absorbed by much better offensive players (mostly Lowell and Marcus Liberty).

Not the same team in 1989 if Jens had stayed and started (28/33 games) and played more minutes than Lowell (22 vs. 19) like he did the prior season. Probably paid a defensive price in both cases, but overall net positive.
I totally agree. But I will add that we could have used Kujawa in the FF against Michigan when Lowell had to leave the game and Battle was also playing hurt.
 
#120      
Lots of times when a game gets lopsided, a team just starts to freelance. Very impressed that the Illini continued to run the offense the same in minute 38 as the rest of the game. Looks to me like this particular group is trying very hard to play the style that Brad wants (up tempo, lots of 3's, layups and FTs...not many hard 2's), no matter who is on the floor. They seem very coachable, and not all ultra-talented players are coachable. The ball seldom sticks and that usually results in the right players taking the right shots. Fun to watch, and it seems like it's a fun style for the players. And in defense of those saying Riley is 17, he is at least 17...and plays like he's 22.
 
#122      
In a similar but different way, reminds me off Jens Kujawa not returning for the 89 Illini season (his senior year) unleashing the run/jump offensive game of the Flying Illini. Lowell took over his starting spot and his minutes were absorbed by much better offensive players (mostly Lowell and Marcus Liberty).

Not the same team in 1989 if Jens had stayed and started (28/33 games) and played more minutes than Lowell (22 vs. 19) like he did the prior season. Probably paid a defensive price in both cases, but overall net positive.
I award you an A+ for the day, simply for making a Jens Kujawa reference.
 
#125      

I was taking another look at how he got his points (very efficient catch and shoot off movement, multiple putbacks, in transition) and I noticed the play he got the 2nd 4 point opportunity was really nice. He sets a pindown for KJ to come up and run a PNR then Morez screens Wills man as he rolls and Will is reversing direction back up top. KJ and Morez's defenders are worried about the on ball pick and roll and then Wills guy is screened with no help for a wide open shot. Beautifully drawn up and executed with lots of counters that can come from it.
 
Back