Pregame: Illinois at Nebraska, Friday, September 20th, 7:00pm CT, FOX

Status
Not open for further replies.
#151      
I have had us marked for a win in this one since the preseason however I had Kansas as a loss. I was/am willing to settle for 3-1 in our first 4 but still think there is a chance we walk out with the W on Friday and move to 4-0.

You all have touched on the fact that this will be Raiola's first real test against a defense with substance. The key's on the defensive side of the ball should be to confuse Raiola with pre-snap looks that either show we are bringing pressure, manning up and bailing to zone or vise-versa. The more looks we can give him the better. However, I believe the real factor is getting pressure on him with 4-5 people so the rest of the group can match up on the outside and play centerfield down the middle. I don't want us to get into a situation where we are having to bring 5+ people every down just to get some pressure. We have to sure up the run defense as well. We cant allow those 10+ yard chunk runs like we have been. Ultimately we are living up to the bend don't break defense so far but a couple chunk plays can break you in a hurry. Also don't let #24 get involved to much in this game, I feel like he was there for a big play whenever they needed it last year.

Key on offense is going to be playing mistake free football. Don't turn the ball over, win TOP, don't get in 3rd and longs and finish drives with touchdowns. There needs to be an emphasis on interior run blocking this week as well as coaching up Feagin to get downhill faster and to run with a lower pad level. I would also like to see more underneath mesh routes (backs, TE, slot guys). Would love to see Wilcher get involved with this mesh concept given his speed, hit him in stride underneath and let him cut up field in space and see what happens. The injury to Rusk isn't being talked about enough, I think that is really setting this offense back. We don't have a TE or safety net out there with sure hands or the speed to turn nothing into something. Arkin has had a couple timely drops that would have really put us over the edge.

Not able to make it to this game but please fill their stands like they did to us last year. I cant stand that stupid go big red cheer they do, lets just shut them up!!!
 
#152      
Better offensive line play is mandatory. I assume the staff is working on it.

My guess is that we'll keep trying to do the same things we have been doing, expecting better results as the line gels. So, now is a good time for the line to gel.

IMHO, that is the key to a potential victory over Nebraska. If our O'line improves to the point we have long, sustained drives, our D'line will look better by virtue of not being on the field. When on the field field, the D'line should be hungry for action.

Friday evening should be interesting.
 
#153      
So what’s up with the offensive line. Why are they struggling?


They are getting blown up in the run game. Besides for technique the issue is leverage, power, core strength and balance. It’s cliche but give me some guys who wrestled in hs. They will play with leverage and balance. Also is great for their hands. If your are just big and slow it’s easy for the dline to get into your pads and move you.
 
#154      
Road wins all!

1993
1726520947883.png
 
#156      
pretty sure our oline knows all about proper technique .

it’s as if there is something one or more of our linemen is doing that is a “tell” to the defense that we are going to run .

I think we need to simply use Valentine and run outside more and stop with the Feagin running to the 1 or 2 , and 3 or 4 gaps.

I really think the answer is not that complicated . Feagin can run the ball well, but we can’t telegraph it to the D what downs & where we plan to do it
 
#158      
So I do think Nebraska is for real this year, but just for grins I went back and looked at Rhule’s CV. He had a couple of really good seasons at Temple, but what shot him to the top of the list of program builders was probably the job he did at Baylor, specifically an 11-3 season that got him poached by the NFL.

However, in that 11-3 season Baylor beat 0 ranked teams and needed OT to beat a 4-8 TTU and a 5-7 TCU. Similar vibes to basketball coaches who become hot commodities after tourney runs.

I do think he’s a much better coach than Frost and raises their floor significantly, but I’m not sure there’s a large enough sample size to show he’s one of the best in the business.

Will be a tough game. I agree trenches will be a problem but first real test for a tru Frosh QB too. We get a couple of TOs and we’ve got a shot.
 
#160      
It's the run blocking...more so the interior run-blocking...

IMO pass blocking is fine. You can just sense it - the difference this year vs last year at this time Luke scrambling for his life on seemingly literally every drop-back.

The 2 tackles also seem to be fine. Struggles are on the interior...
I agree with this, but I also saw our left tackle get blown by on the outside multiple times for losses in the backfield on run plays. I think the problem runs deeper than just interior linemen.
 
Last edited:
#161      
I have had us marked for a win in this one since the preseason however I had Kansas as a loss. I was/am willing to settle for 3-1 in our first 4 but still think there is a chance we walk out with the W on Friday and move to 4-0.

You all have touched on the fact that this will be Raiola's first real test against a defense with substance. The key's on the defensive side of the ball should be to confuse Raiola with pre-snap looks that either show we are bringing pressure, manning up and bailing to zone or vise-versa. The more looks we can give him the better. However, I believe the real factor is getting pressure on him with 4-5 people so the rest of the group can match up on the outside and play centerfield down the middle. I don't want us to get into a situation where we are having to bring 5+ people every down just to get some pressure. We have to sure up the run defense as well. We cant allow those 10+ yard chunk runs like we have been. Ultimately we are living up to the bend don't break defense so far but a couple chunk plays can break you in a hurry. Also don't let #24 get involved to much in this game, I feel like he was there for a big play whenever they needed it last year.

Key on offense is going to be playing mistake free football. Don't turn the ball over, win TOP, don't get in 3rd and longs and finish drives with touchdowns. There needs to be an emphasis on interior run blocking this week as well as coaching up Feagin to get downhill faster and to run with a lower pad level. I would also like to see more underneath mesh routes (backs, TE, slot guys). Would love to see Wilcher get involved with this mesh concept given his speed, hit him in stride underneath and let him cut up field in space and see what happens. The injury to Rusk isn't being talked about enough, I think that is really setting this offense back. We don't have a TE or safety net out there with sure hands or the speed to turn nothing into something. Arkin has had a couple timely drops that would have really put us over the edge.

Not able to make it to this game but please fill their stands like they did to us last year. I cant stand that stupid go big red cheer they do, lets just shut them up!!!
Oh is that it?
 
#162      
Great start 3-0.

My goal is to go 8-4 regular season. The schedule favors us.

We should be favored at home vs Purdue Minnesota and Michigan State which gets us to 6 wins.

All we have to do is steal 2 wins vs @ Nebraska, Michigan @ home, @ Rutgers or @ NW. I think that is very doable.

View attachment 36308
Agree, but I’ll shift NU to one we should win. They don’t look great, and that isn’t a road game in any meaningful sense … it will be at Wrigley in front of a hell of a lot more orange than purple, especially if we are still above .500 at that point.
 
#164      
So what’s up with the offensive line. Why are they struggling?
1) Not winning the point of attack. Need to be able to get your hands on a smaller Dlinemen, otherwise they're winning the leverage battle.

2) A few breakdowns where we didn't read the defense correctly. One example I remember was a sack (think it was 2nd quarter). CMU showed a 6 man pressure, so we called for a half slide to the left (make the DB on the right run all the way around the RT and have the RB pick him up). Except CMU disguised coverage well and the linebacker on that side dropped off into coverage, so the right side gets overwhelmed with 4 rushers against 3 blockers.

I see a LOT of other OLs struggling this early in the year with very similar issues. Some teams are better at hiding it than others depending on whether their QB can get the ball out quickly
 
#166      
Hate to be pessimistic for this week, but I’m optimistic long term. This will be a tough one and I’m not so sure they can come away with a w. I think the next two weeks are tough, but then they’ll be ready to take it to Purdue, and as I’ve been saying for a while upset Michigan. Then Oregon with a final stretch of 4 very winnable games, to go 9-3. They could drop two others, and that’d still be 7-5… not too bad.

Of course I think the illini have a chance, and hope they pull it off. If Illinois wins I’ll predict that raiola threw for a lot of yards, but a lot of picks as well because of an aggressive defensive scheme. Put pressure on the young qb and trust your dbs. We shall see. Go illini!
 
Last edited:
#169      
8 wins? are we seriously kidding rn? why is everyone so scared to acknowledge it? this team has MAJOR problems in the trenches. if this continues, this isn't a bowl team.

most likely outcome is still we don't get to 6 based on how we've played in the trenches. we'd be lucky to stay within 2 touchdowns at halftime friday night.
 
#171      
This might be a hair too pessimistic for me but I prefer this sentiment over people taking about how there’s not a game left on the schedule we can’t win. Is it possible that we are team that can go into the stadiums of 2 of the top 10 programs and beat them? Yeah, I guess. But we haven’t run the ball effectively against anyone yet, and we have absolutely no depth dang-near anywhere. Our offensive line isn’t where it needs to be and our QB had some notable flaws that will be exacerbated against better competition. You can look at this as as optimistically as you want and there’s plenty reason to do so, but there are plenty of things cutting the other way too. We rant don’t know what this team is yet.

Tl;dr - going into this season, landing somewhere between 5 to 7 wins was the expected range of outcomes. Let’s not get so high on the early returns that 6-6 is a letdown.
We're 3-0. I like our chances for at least 7 or 8 wins.
 
#172      
So are we pretty much of the notion that this game is more tough than home scUM?

I mean...that's not necessarily something we would've claimed at the start of the year, and only thing that's happened is them losing to the #1 team in land. Certainly does seem like they have some issues though...particularly the QB spot.
 
#173      
I watched most of the first half of the northern Iowa game against Nebraska and all I can say is we better maintain defensive coverage on the edges because they do throw a lot of screens and a lot of check downs to the running backs.
 
#175      
So are we pretty much of the notion that this game is more tough than home scUM?

I mean...that's not necessarily something we would've claimed at the start of the year, and only thing that's happened is them losing to the #1 team in land. Certainly does seem like they have some issues though...particularly the QB spot.
Possibly. Michigan still runs the ball as good as anyone, and if they have time to figure out their QB situation.....

I don't like our chances in this game is the otber.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back