sacraig
- The desert
He's Grayson Allen but not as good.Has anyone heard what Kriisa is like in the locker room?
He's Grayson Allen but not as good.Has anyone heard what Kriisa is like in the locker room?
I don't understand how this is the "correct" take when we've now had two straight seasons that were tanked in part by unpredictable personalities at PG.Not adding Kriisa just because you don’t like his personality when we desperately need a PG is just the absolute incorrect take.
I am totally in agreement that we need to upgrade at PG.If we're going into the season with Rodgers and DGL as our only PGs ...that's a complete roll of the dice.
Do you have any links to what Krissa did for you to call him a headcase?
It's the staff's job to mold teams and give them an identity. If they think that he's a fit, then he's a fit.
I live in Tucson and work at U. Arizona. The range of responses I've heard have been "meh" at best to "good riddance."I am totally in agreement that we need to upgrade at PG.
My issue with Krissa is this. I have friends in Tucson that are rabid UA Cat fans.
My buddies say good riddance. They also say his Wildcat team mates are hoping the door doesn't hit him in the butt on his way out either.
And we all saw how great this staff was last year at molding renegades into a well functioning team unit
While I don't know how Krissa is the locker room, I do agree with you that the melding of guys with big personalities was not done well last year. I can understand the hesitancy. Last year's team chemistry was a problem.I am totally in agreement that we need to upgrade at PG.
My issue with Krissa is this. I have friends in Tucson that are rabid UA Cat fans.
My buddies say good riddance. They also say his Wildcat team mates are hoping the door doesn't hit him in the butt on his way out either.
And we all saw how great this staff was last year at molding renegades into a well functioning team unit
Last year's team chemistry was the problem.While I don't know how Krissa is the locker room, I do agree with you that the melding of guys with big personalities was not done well last year. I can understand the hesitancy. Last year's team chemistry was a problem.
That’s fair, but I’d like to see where he was called that besides on this board.I would hardly characterize the role of "locker room cancer" as a "personality." Team dynamics should absolutely come into play when making roster construction decisions.
I don't know how big of a concern this is. But it's certainly a legitimate one, if true.
Because they were bad in the locker room. The only place I have seen anyone say Kerr was toxic in the locker room was on this board. He can talk and mock fans all he wants and still be a good teammate and net positive for his team.I don't understand how this is the "correct" take when we've now had two straight seasons that were tanked in part by unpredictable personalities at PG.
I'm all for adding him and his villain personality if he meshes well in the locker room. That is the only thing that matters.Not adding Kriisa just because you don’t like his personality when we desperately need a PG is just the absolute incorrect take.
How did taking bad locker room guys last year go for this team?Not adding Kriisa just because you don’t like his personality when we desperately need a PG is just the absolute incorrect take.
Well only Sky was a PG. So that was a huge part of the issue. Do any of us really personally know Kriisa? I think not. I feel the staff should certainly reach out and try to evaluate him as a teamate for themselves. They know our players better than anyone. If they feel he can help us at PG id be fired up to land him. If they don't feel that way that's fine too.How did taking bad locker room guys last year go for this team?
All that I said about him there is some serious upside. When he's healthy he is very capable of getting the ball to scorers, plays with confidence, and he can really really shoot when he gets good in rhythm shots.So he's basically a merging of Matthew Mayer and Andre Curbelo except he's also a bad defender? Call me crazy but I think we'd be stupid to pursue.
I understand the need for a steady PG but there's a major downside to putting the ball in the hands someone erratic. We want decisions and shots being made/taken by our best players and not having them held hostage by the whims of our PG.
The coach who recruited him just resigned under a lot of controversy and the WVU program has immediately been thrown into complete uncertainty. Yeah, we don't know his Krissa's plans, but putting two and two together, there's a good chance he'll be looking for a different destination very soon. We are a program with really good returning talent everywhere else on the floor and with a glaring need at PG. Considering our program would definitely make sense for him.The funniest part about this is the fact that:
1. He has not made any indication he will leave WVU
2. Has any interest in coming to Illinois if he does leave WVU
Obviously both those things can change, just still amusing that we're debating over someone like that.
33-4, 28-7 teams can let star PG go because they have 4 star freshman on bench (Boswell), just signed #1 European player, and have Caleb Love coming in from UNC.I am totally in agreement that we need to upgrade at PG.
My issue with Krissa is this. I have friends in Tucson that are rabid UA Cat fans.
My buddies say good riddance. They also say his Wildcat team mates are hoping the door doesn't hit him in the butt on his way out either.
And we all saw how great this staff was last year at molding renegades into a well functioning team unit
Don't say any of this to the majority on here. They will tell you he must be a bad teammate because he gets animated on the court and riles up opposing fans....Spoke with my Arizona insider (the same one who said Epps was likely gone several weeks before anything public came out) regarding Kriisa with regards to locker room and fit. He had the following to say:
Teammates and coaches really liked him and no known locker room issues. A player you love to hate as an opponent but a good teammate. Transferred because with the new talent coming in minutes were going to be reduced for him and he'd be more of a 6th man role. Frustratingly inconsistent- when he's on, he's straight fire. When he's off he can lose you a game. Not viewed as an NBA prospect but should have a decent future overseas. Loves and works best in a fast-paced or transition offense. If you have a team that runs the court hard and wants to get on the other end of lobs he'll work out well for you, but you will need to deal with inconsistent play.
Overall though, he thinks Kerr would be a solid addition to our team if we were to go after and get him. Take what you will of that.
Could be....I've noticed that our insiders have not weighed in on the Kerr speculation...