Darn. I saw those colors before reading and got excited.
Not the Orange and Blue I was hoping for…
Darn. I saw those colors before reading and got excited.
Not the Orange and Blue I was hoping for…
I'm no scout and I watched zero Depaul games, but just looking at David Jones's scoring stats leaves me wondering whether he's a good investment, in terms of rotation minutes. Yes, he averaged 14.5 ppg, but was that a function of volume, rather than efficiency?
Using Plummer as a familiar comp (selected due to similarity in ppg) ...
per game Jones Plummer points 14.5 14.6 free throw attempts 2.8 2.6 free throw % 69.2% 87.4% 3pt attempts 4.2 7.3 3pt % 29.7% 40.8% 2pt attempts 8.5 3.7 2pt % 51.9% 45.5%
Jones's 3pt % (29.7%) would have put him 7th on last year's Illini roster, comparable to Coleman, but on double the volume of attempts - not exactly a thrilling thought. Jake's volume (4.5 per game) is the most comparable to Jones's, but Jake shot them at a 41.0% clip - much more efficient.
Jones was Depaul's second leading scorer, and also second in field goal attempts per game - so not necessarily the focus of opposing defenses, but near the top of the scouting report. That could obviously skew his percentages downward, compared to him maybe being say the 3rd or 4th scoring option for us next year.
His 7.4 rebounds in 29.9 mpg seems good - puts him almost directly in the middle of Kofi and Damonte, in both regards.
Is he a quality defender? Is he more of a guard or wing? Maybe our excitement is more about projection than past production?
NIL has sure changed things…. This guy belongs at Purdue but it looks like they don’t have the money to make it happen
Very good points...he is heavy usage player so far....could be because of his team...stats don't jump out...wonder where 24/7 has him ranked as a transfer...I'm no scout and I watched zero Depaul games, but just looking at David Jones's scoring stats leaves me wondering whether he's a good investment, in terms of rotation minutes. Yes, he averaged 14.5 ppg, but was that a function of volume, rather than efficiency?
Using Plummer as a familiar comp (selected due to similarity in ppg) ...
per game Jones Plummer points 14.5 14.6 free throw attempts 2.8 2.6 free throw % 69.2% 87.4% 3pt attempts 4.2 7.3 3pt % 29.7% 40.8% 2pt attempts 8.5 3.7 2pt % 51.9% 45.5%
Jones's 3pt % (29.7%) would have put him 7th on last year's Illini roster, comparable to Coleman, but on double the volume of attempts - not exactly a thrilling thought. Jake's volume (4.5 per game) is the most comparable to Jones's, but Jake shot them at a 41.0% clip - much more efficient.
Jones was Depaul's second leading scorer, and also second in field goal attempts per game - so not necessarily the focus of opposing defenses, but near the top of the scouting report. That could obviously skew his percentages downward, compared to him maybe being say the 3rd or 4th scoring option for us next year.
His 7.4 rebounds in 29.9 mpg seems good - puts him almost directly in the middle of Kofi and Damonte, in both regards.
Is he a quality defender? Is he more of a guard or wing? Maybe our excitement is more about projection than past production?
This is just gross. In 5 years recruiting will be like a bid fantasy football draft. They can do it all online.
I'd rather have AM.David Jones went live on IG earlier and I hopped on and commented saying to link up with RJ. He said he doesn’t have a commitment timeline also.
All in all, if we do get him, I’m gonna take some credit for it.
I get why you compared his shooting to Plummer’s because they averaged almost the same ppg, but it is a silly comparison. Plummer is known as a shooter and was arguably the best shooter on the team.I'm no scout and I watched zero Depaul games, but just looking at David Jones's scoring stats leaves me wondering whether he's a good investment, in terms of rotation minutes. Yes, he averaged 14.5 ppg, but was that a function of volume, rather than efficiency?
Using Plummer as a familiar comp (selected due to similarity in ppg) ...
per game Jones Plummer points 14.5 14.6 free throw attempts 2.8 2.6 free throw % 69.2% 87.4% 3pt attempts 4.2 7.3 3pt % 29.7% 40.8% 2pt attempts 8.5 3.7 2pt % 51.9% 45.5%
Jones's 3pt % (29.7%) would have put him 7th on last year's Illini roster, comparable to Coleman, but on double the volume of attempts - not exactly a thrilling thought. Jake's volume (4.5 per game) is the most comparable to Jones's, but Jake shot them at a 41.0% clip - much more efficient.
Jones was Depaul's second leading scorer, and also second in field goal attempts per game - so not necessarily the focus of opposing defenses, but near the top of the scouting report. That could obviously skew his percentages downward, compared to him maybe being say the 3rd or 4th scoring option for us next year.
His 7.4 rebounds in 29.9 mpg seems good - puts him almost directly in the middle of Kofi and Damonte, in both regards.
Is he a quality defender? Is he more of a guard or wing? Maybe our excitement is more about projection than past production?
You’re probably right that he could play SG. Optimum is definitely SF. For some reason I thought he was a little bigger and could play the 4 — probably because of his rebounding ability. But heck, who knows once Fletch gets hold of him.He’s a very good rebounder and defender. More of a SF, but could play SG, especially if outside shot continues to improve.
coaches will bench their big NIL guy just like they bench their five star. whenever it helps them win games. it's changed the process for getting recruits, but I don't think it's going to really change playing time decisions.Remember some NBA players got their biggest contracts and tank right after? I can see that happen with NIL/Portal. Do you bench your half Mil NIL player if he doesn't fit? I don't mind Brad being more prudent. College basketball is going to be mad. NIL can be a two edge sword.
I think you are partially right but these NIL guys will probably have longer leash. Don't you think coaches/AD have to go to boosters to convince them for NIL money? Bench them means you are wrong about the player and willl make it harder to go back to the same booster. Now thinking about all these I understand why Wright would retire.coaches will bench their big NIL guy just like they bench their five star. whenever it helps them win games. it's changed the process for getting recruits, but I don't think it's going to really change playing time decisions.
As to prudence, it's just like with scholarships. there's a limited number and you better make good use of them.
Thought NLI wasn’t supposed to be pay to play. Also very interested in how foreign players are getting paid on student visas. I guess it’s nice to at least see it out in the openThis is just gross. In 5 years recruiting will be like a bid fantasy football draft. They can do it all online.
I’m pretty sure the statement was that we will have a better idea what the roster will look like by the end of the week. We have that knowing that Kofi won’t be a part of it. If you thought the entire roster was going to be settled by the end of the week, thats on you because it’s not realistic in the current state of college basketball.Are we still going learn a lot about how this team would look like by the end of the week? Right now it just looks like we won’t have Kofi, and it’s not looking that good.
Just share your opinion of where TSJ will land, then sit back and crack a beer/pop a gummy.Are we gonna let something like no new information stop this thread...not me!! Board buds and insider crew it's time to punch in...2nd shift is on....
Yeah, I’ve been on the AM Reunion Train forever … I’d take him back right now and consider it a good portal season. Kid was primed for a great sophomore year, IMO.I'd rather have AM.
and putting up thousands of dollars for losses doesn't sit well with donors either.I think you are partially right but these NIL guys will probably have longer leash. Don't you think coaches/AD have to go to boosters to convince them for NIL money? Bench them means you are wrong about the player and willl make it harder to go back to the same booster. Now thinking about all these I understand why Wright would retire.
Not a DePaul fan by any true stretch, but I am a relatively recent DePaul MBA alum! Cheers!Closet DPU fan here. Jones is an absolute stud. Bull in a China shop player on both ends. He would instantly be the best slasher/penetrator Illinois has had in a while. Comparable to Rice and Hill on that front. He's a good distance shooter, % suffered a bit because he shot a lot off the dribble, or in transition, rather than off ball movement and wide open looks.
Sure, he took some I'll advised shots, and penetrated in traffic to much, but it was him or JFL that had to force offense.
I don't think he comes to the beloved, but that's only due to nut punch protection, no insider here.
I would LOVE it if he came, but my gut tells me he's going to SJU to play with AC. Hope I'm wrong.
Not directed at you but..everyone mostly forgets that they have to clear admissions before announcing...I’m pretty sure the statement was that we will have a better idea what the roster will look like by the end of the week. We have that knowing that Kofi won’t be a part of it. If you thought the entire roster was going to be settled by the end of the week, thats on you because it’s not realistic in the current state of college basketball.
He gone jmo...already there ...lolJust share your opinion of where TSJ will land, then sits back and crack a beer/pop a gummy.
Thank you for that table. As an algebra teacher I love a good table for the visual.I'm no scout and I watched zero Depaul games, but just looking at David Jones's scoring stats leaves me wondering whether he's a good investment, in terms of rotation minutes. Yes, he averaged 14.5 ppg, but was that a function of volume, rather than efficiency?
Using Plummer as a familiar comp (selected due to similarity in ppg) ...
per game Jones Plummer points 14.5 14.6 free throw attempts 2.8 2.6 free throw % 69.2% 87.4% 3pt attempts 4.2 7.3 3pt % 29.7% 40.8% 2pt attempts 8.5 3.7 2pt % 51.9% 45.5%
Jones's 3pt % (29.7%) would have put him 7th on last year's Illini roster, comparable to Coleman, but on double the volume of attempts - not exactly a thrilling thought. Jake's volume (4.5 per game) is the most comparable to Jones's, but Jake shot them at a 41.0% clip - much more efficient.
Jones was Depaul's second leading scorer, and also second in field goal attempts per game - so not necessarily the focus of opposing defenses, but near the top of the scouting report. That could obviously skew his percentages downward, compared to him maybe being say the 3rd or 4th scoring option for us next year.
His 7.4 rebounds in 29.9 mpg seems good - puts him almost directly in the middle of Kofi and Damonte, in both regards.
Is he a quality defender? Is he more of a guard or wing? Maybe our excitement is more about projection than past production?
These things almost always take longer to play out than we think they will. The Clark brothers were an exception.I’m pretty sure the statement was that we will have a better idea what the roster will look like by the end of the week. We have that knowing that Kofi won’t be a part of it. If you thought the entire roster was going to be settled by the end of the week, thats on you because it’s not realistic in the current state of college basketball.
I don't understand why this went so quiet.Yeah, I’ve been on the AM Reunion Train forever … I’d take him back right now and consider it a good portal season. Kid was primed for a great sophomore year, IMO.
I don’t pay for any premium info, so all I’m ever relaying is free to all info. Ked doesn’t provide near what we get from our insiders here, but without any input from them today, I was just sharing what was said. Certainly not ground breaking, but thought a few would be interested even if you weren’t.What a whole bunch of nothing lol. I’m sorry but that is all fluff. I know he can’t say names. But if people are paying money for that kinda insight then my god.
I agree fully with this. The difference in the nba is your top players make more than your coach, so from the outset you know who is more important to your team.coaches will bench their big NIL guy just like they bench their five star. whenever it helps them win games. it's changed the process for getting recruits, but I don't think it's going to really change playing time decisions.