They should dump nike and go with someone else anyway.This is year 4 fwiw.
14-15-16-17 was the initial Nike rebrand unis and 18-19-20-21 has been the updated versions.
They should dump nike and go with someone else anyway.This is year 4 fwiw.
14-15-16-17 was the initial Nike rebrand unis and 18-19-20-21 has been the updated versions.
Every designer has had high profile blunders with their uniforms.They should dump nike and go with someone else anyway.
Adidas makes terrible looking uniforms and Under Armour is a really struggling company. Don't assume the grass is always greener.They should dump nike and go with someone else anyway.
Not about looks, just don't think anyone should buy anything from Nike period.Adidas makes terrible looking uniforms and Under Armour is a really struggling company. Don't assume the grass is always greener.
Honestly curious- how is Under Armour struggling?Adidas makes terrible looking uniforms and Under Armour is a really struggling company. Don't assume the grass is always greener.
Well, its stock price is less than half what it was in 2015. And it seems to have receded as a third power in the Nike-Adidas sponsorship wars. Puma and even New Balance seem like they're both as big if not bigger players in that space now.Honestly curious- how is Under Armour struggling?
What's next Reebok making a comeback?Well, its stock price is less than half what it was in 2015. And it seems to have receded as a third power in the Nike-Adidas sponsorship wars. Puma and even New Balance seem like they're both as big if not bigger players in that space now.
Reebok did recently become independent of Adidas again, stranger things have happened.What's next Reebok making a comeback?
It’s a shame on UA. Schools I’ve worked at have bought jerseys and shoes from them. Quality similar to or better than Nike and significantly less money. And they offered better incentives for free stuff when you spent certain amounts.Well, its stock price is less than half what it was in 2015. And it seems to have receded as a third power in the Nike-Adidas sponsorship wars. Puma and even New Balance seem like they're both as big if not bigger players in that space now.
UA is still pretty competitive in the college sponsorship space, maybe that's why.It’s a shame on UA. Schools I’ve worked at have bought jerseys and shoes from them. Quality similar to or better than Nike and significantly less money. And they offered better incentives for free stuff when you spent certain amounts.
This was all basketball gear though so maybe the football stuff where they make their most money isn’t up to snuff.
My problem with Nike, as a fan of a Nike team, is that if your school/team isn't one of the select few, you can't find any decent apparel. I don't think Nike even sells Illinois jerseys, in either football or basketball. I've looked, they don't exist. Their website has basketball jerseys for Oregon, MSU, OSU, Duke and Kentucky. That's it. Heck, they have more Iowa gear on their website than Illini gear. If Nike ever gets into the NIL game we are screwed, because they aren't doing us any favors.UA is still pretty competitive in the college sponsorship space, maybe that's why.
That seems like one of the three big pillars, with the other two being international soccer (where UA has basically disappeared after making a big splash some years back) and basketball shoes for NBA players (where UA made a big push and seems to have done poorly, Steph Curry's shoes get made fun of on twitter a lot).
There's also of course the pro league apparel sponsorships, where Nike has the NFL, NBA and MLB now, and Adidas has the NHL and MLS.
Fight it all you want, Nike is still the gold standard.
It has been the subject of Federal investigations into its accounting practices since 2015 and those problems haven't gone away. That's a canary in the coal mine for sales struggles. The sharp stock price drop during a bull market is the most important piece of data, as someone else noted.Honestly curious- how is Under Armour struggling?
Somebody should check out Syracuse's helmets from their Rutgers game. What I saw were impeccable and may have been painted rather than stickers. Center stripes perfectly matched contours, gaps, and slits regardless of the helmet style or manufacturer and the S was perfectly placed on every helmet I saw.Equipment manager Trent Chesnut is 'a staple' of the Illini football program
“The process of putting each stripe on the helmet and making sure the ‘Block I’ decal was straight when a player wore the helmet took hours, but the social media reaction was favorable during a Week Zero game when the new-look helmets officially took the field.”
That article was a fun read - thanks for posting.Equipment manager Trent Chesnut is 'a staple' of the Illini football program
“The process of putting each stripe on the helmet and making sure the ‘Block I’ decal was straight when a player wore the helmet took hours, but the social media reaction was favorable during a Week Zero game when the new-look helmets officially took the field.”
Shame. I know I'm in the minority here, but I always liked us switching up our uniforms every week. To me, it was fun and they looked quite good. Especially the grey ghosts. They were an awesome set imo. Oh well, winning games is more important.For those of you who missed Monday's press conference, here are Coach Bielema's comments about the Gray Ghost uniforms and orange helmet: