Would you pay for a tattoo?I’d pay serious money to see the basketball players tape an to their head.
Would you pay for a tattoo?I’d pay serious money to see the basketball players tape an to their head.
I am consistently amazed at the quantity of discourse devoted to the uniforms.
I like those uniforms... I know the 5th grader emphasis ILLINOIS isn't everyone's cup of tea, and I like just the block I better, but I think those are clean and crisp and as you pointed out, the orange was on point. Piping was cool, half stripe on pants. It really came together well. It's a good midway point between stripes and piping on everything and what we have now (essentially a uniform with iron on numbers and names). It looks like such a late 2000's uniform, but it fits well in that time period. Also... why when I quoted you did the image change from Ferguson to Scheelhaase, kinda weird.
This is my primary (only?) issue with the uniform rebrand. The new reddish-orange looks dirty and ugly in comparison to the old orange. The previous Illini orange was so unique and identifiable that you could pick it out in a crowd of other orange hues. Paired with Illinois blue, that combo was bold, audacious, and visually striking - perfect school colors. The new colors look like Nike was trying to find a nice autumn bridesmaid dress color.
If you were to take a group of fans wearing apparel from Syracuse, Clemson, Princeton, Texas, Oregon State, and Oklahoma State, and then stand them next to someone wearing the previous Illinois colors, your first reaction might be, "Woah – Illinois is orange." These days it's, "Hey, is that Syracuse?"
Thanks, Nike.
Yep, the Zook era uniforms were very much of their time. And the OBW with the occasional OOW was a nice, simple set of combos.
Yep, other than the atrocious helmets, I was actually a huge fan of those uniforms.
For it was the piping. It was so unnecessary, really busy-ed up some nice unis. .
Agree. I might be in the minority but I've never been a fan of any combo that involved white with the unis. Our colors are orange and blue. When done alone they look really great. Start adding white, gray, or any other color into the picture and I feel like it just dilutes our brand and image (though I'm okay with teh gray ghost unis ONCE a year, if they can get the color right). Give me O/B/O or O/O/B all day every day.I've said it before and I'll say it again, I hate the white pants. I get it if you're a school like Wisky or PSU and you only have 1 color, but we have 2. It's a very SEC/ACC look for a school with 2 colors and forsake one of them and go with white pants. Minny started doing this around the same time we did, probably a Nike thing, and it always just bothered me, can't say why though.
But the piping was the whole thing, the entire design was built on that. It was a Nike template of course, but it suited the OBW we wore so often.
Hot take o'clock: I think the white pants and/or white helmets look indisputably "better" or "more fashionable" than their orange counterparts, but I don't think that is what we should be going for. I think in order for us to at all create a sort of brand or unique, identifiable look, we should wear orange pants as often as possible. This is a very recent, newly developed opinion of mine.
Our orange helmet (white facemask) is our main identifier and has been since butkus.
The white mask is more a personal preference. I may or may not tweet rant about it.
Was that really Beckman's reasoning? Not that I can't see Beckman pretending to explain that reason. Might want to tell Clemson, Georgia, and Oklahoma. Imagine how good they could be if they only knew to eliminate glare by losing the white facemasks....Beckman did away with the white facemasks. Something to do with the glare of the sun/lights.
Ofcourse that doesn't mean Lovie can't bring them back. But that was the rationale behind the switch in 2012.
Was that really Beckman's reasoning? Not that I can't see Beckman pretending to explain that reason. Might want to tell Clemson, Georgia, and Oklahoma. Imagine how good they could be if they only knew to eliminate glare by losing the white facemasks....
Yeah that makes a lot of sense with the rebrand coming. That was the introduction of the all matte blue helmet with block I (that actually looked pretty good), and of course the state outline helmet (not a fan).New coaches seem to always want to add some little tweak to the uniforms to mark their territory. Zook added the outline to slant Illinois, Beckman switched the facemasks to blue, Lovie took the stripes off the helmet, etc.
My understanding with Beckman though was that we had already initiated the rebrand process and so Thomas gave Beckman & Co the green light to just start experimenting and do whatever they wanted until the new stuff came. So there were a lot of rinky-dink changes during that period.