Illinois Football Uniforms

Status
Not open for further replies.
#353      
I like those uniforms... I know the 5th grader emphasis ILLINOIS isn't everyone's cup of tea, and I like just the block I better, but I think those are clean and crisp and as you pointed out, the orange was on point. Piping was cool, half stripe on pants. It really came together well. It's a good midway point between stripes and piping on everything and what we have now (essentially a uniform with iron on numbers and names). It looks like such a late 2000's uniform, but it fits well in that time period. Also... why when I quoted you did the image change from Ferguson to Scheelhaase, kinda weird.

This is my primary (only?) issue with the uniform rebrand. The new reddish-orange looks dirty and ugly in comparison to the old orange. The previous Illini orange was so unique and identifiable that you could pick it out in a crowd of other orange hues. Paired with Illinois blue, that combo was bold, audacious, and visually striking - perfect school colors. The new colors look like Nike was trying to find a nice autumn bridesmaid dress color.

If you were to take a group of fans wearing apparel from Syracuse, Clemson, Princeton, Texas, Oregon State, and Oklahoma State, and then stand them next to someone wearing the previous Illinois colors, your first reaction might be, "Woah – Illinois is orange." These days it's, "Hey, is that Syracuse?"

Thanks, Nike.
 
#354      
This is my primary (only?) issue with the uniform rebrand. The new reddish-orange looks dirty and ugly in comparison to the old orange. The previous Illini orange was so unique and identifiable that you could pick it out in a crowd of other orange hues. Paired with Illinois blue, that combo was bold, audacious, and visually striking - perfect school colors. The new colors look like Nike was trying to find a nice autumn bridesmaid dress color.

If you were to take a group of fans wearing apparel from Syracuse, Clemson, Princeton, Texas, Oregon State, and Oklahoma State, and then stand them next to someone wearing the previous Illinois colors, your first reaction might be, "Woah – Illinois is orange." These days it's, "Hey, is that Syracuse?"

Thanks, Nike.

I don't entirely disagree, but the problem with getting the old orange to look the same on different surfaces was a real thing

quaterback-jon-beutjer-of-the-university-of-illinois-fighting-illini-picture-id52181887


Clemson has that problem too, the helmets always look darker than everything else. It's amazing how little you care when you win 11 games every year.
 
#360      
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I hate the white pants. I get it if you're a school like Wisky or PSU and you only have 1 color, but we have 2. It's a very SEC/ACC look for a school with 2 colors and forsake one of them and go with white pants. Minny started doing this around the same time we did, probably a Nike thing, and it always just bothered me, can't say why though.
 
#361      
I've said it before and I'll say it again, I hate the white pants. I get it if you're a school like Wisky or PSU and you only have 1 color, but we have 2. It's a very SEC/ACC look for a school with 2 colors and forsake one of them and go with white pants. Minny started doing this around the same time we did, probably a Nike thing, and it always just bothered me, can't say why though.
Agree. I might be in the minority but I've never been a fan of any combo that involved white with the unis. Our colors are orange and blue. When done alone they look really great. Start adding white, gray, or any other color into the picture and I feel like it just dilutes our brand and image (though I'm okay with teh gray ghost unis ONCE a year, if they can get the color right). Give me O/B/O or O/O/B all day every day.
 
#362      
O/B/O should be, in my humble opinion, our most used combo. I'm also partial to O/B/B reserved for big games, as that used to be the tradition when I was younger. I remember them coming out with orange pants for warm ups then taking the field in all blues right before the game started and the place going nuts.
 
#365      
Hot take o'clock: I think the white pants and/or white helmets look indisputably "better" or "more fashionable" than their orange counterparts, but I don't think that is what we should be going for. I think in order for us to at all create a sort of brand or unique, identifiable look, we should wear orange pants as often as possible. This is a very recent, newly developed opinion of mine.
 
#366      
Hot take o'clock: I think the white pants and/or white helmets look indisputably "better" or "more fashionable" than their orange counterparts, but I don't think that is what we should be going for. I think in order for us to at all create a sort of brand or unique, identifiable look, we should wear orange pants as often as possible. This is a very recent, newly developed opinion of mine.

THIS THIS THIS! We've worn orange helmets for X number of years of our history. When random college football fans tune into our games, and they see us wearing grey, I guarantee you it takes them a hot minute to be like "who is this again?" Our orange helmet (white facemask) is our main identifier and has been since butkus. One Helmet. To rule them all.

Others might work and be stylish, make recruits tweet fire emojis. But its not Illinois.
 
#371      
To me the white facemask was only to match the white slant Illinois on the helmets. Since slant Illinois is the worst thing ever, white facemasks aren't too far behind.

No way a white facemask would work with the current helmets.
 
#372      
Beckman did away with the white facemasks. Something to do with the glare of the sun/lights.

Ofcourse that doesn't mean Lovie can't bring them back. But that was the rationale behind the switch in 2012.
 
#373      
Beckman did away with the white facemasks. Something to do with the glare of the sun/lights.

Ofcourse that doesn't mean Lovie can't bring them back. But that was the rationale behind the switch in 2012.
Was that really Beckman's reasoning? Not that I can't see Beckman pretending to explain that reason. Might want to tell Clemson, Georgia, and Oklahoma. Imagine how good they could be if they only knew to eliminate glare by losing the white facemasks....
 
#374      
Was that really Beckman's reasoning? Not that I can't see Beckman pretending to explain that reason. Might want to tell Clemson, Georgia, and Oklahoma. Imagine how good they could be if they only knew to eliminate glare by losing the white facemasks....

New coaches seem to always want to add some little tweak to the uniforms to mark their territory. Zook added the outline to slant Illinois, Beckman switched the facemasks to blue, Lovie took the stripes off the helmet, etc.

My understanding with Beckman though was that we had already initiated the rebrand process and so Thomas gave Beckman & Co the green light to just start experimenting and do whatever they wanted until the new stuff came. So there were a lot of rinky-dink changes during that period.
 
#375      
New coaches seem to always want to add some little tweak to the uniforms to mark their territory. Zook added the outline to slant Illinois, Beckman switched the facemasks to blue, Lovie took the stripes off the helmet, etc.

My understanding with Beckman though was that we had already initiated the rebrand process and so Thomas gave Beckman & Co the green light to just start experimenting and do whatever they wanted until the new stuff came. So there were a lot of rinky-dink changes during that period.
Yeah that makes a lot of sense with the rebrand coming. That was the introduction of the all matte blue helmet with block I (that actually looked pretty good), and of course the state outline helmet (not a fan).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back