What is really discouraging for me is all of the talk last week about self-scouting during the bye week and fixing issues.Game notes
1. Reminder about how Illinois isn't a blue blood and the system is so delicate that it falls apart with one person removed. Xavier Scott out for the game and there were at least three big assignment errors in the second half that led to 100+ offensive yards.
2. The warning signs are staring to pile up for the defense. Another bad showing from the defensive line, struggling to contain a mobile QB and missed tackles. Linebackers getting exposed for a second game. Not as much of an issue shedding blocks but so many missed tackles. Secondary had serious secondary issues for the first time this year and don't need to be repeated.
3. Going off of the previous number, tackling issues are becoming rampant - defensive contributors with tackling grades below 40: Jacas, Kreutz, Briggs, and Barna. Not a great quartet with the team coming into town next week that is going to run the ball 30+ times.
4. Rosiek was much improved yesterday. Him, X, Miles Scott, Bailey, Edwards, and Coleman are the defensive foundation.
5. Kaleb Patterson is taking some much-needed steps forward. Last two games he's been targeted seven times and only allowed one catch. His run defense needs improvement but he might be the best coverage corner on the roster right now.
6. Luke Altmyer appreciation B1G QB rankings:
*4th in adjusted passing yards per attempt (10.1, was only 6.3 last year)
*1st in passing TDs (14, he had 13 all last year)
*5th in passing efficiency rating (167.7, was 131.9 last year)
*On pace for most Illinois QB passing yards since 2013 Scheelhaase
*Current pace numbers are 2,852 passing yards, 28 passing TDs, 2 INTs
*Last one, and biggest: Altmyer's current QB rating would be the highest in Illinois football history.
7. Hank Beatty - #1 punt returner in Big Ten. Averaging 16.6 yards per return.
8. Pat Bryant still on pace to shatter the Illinois WR TD record. He'll need to pick up the pace to get to 1k receiving yards.
9. Offensive line - Henderson started in place as a change up from the past starting five and he was okay. Crisler later got snaps and had one of his better games by PFF grades. Kreutz with three straight 80+ passing grade games. The good pass blocking - bad run blocking on the interior is still a problem and there aren't a lot of remaining solutions beyond starting Wigenton.
10. McCray was awesome. Averaged 2.8 yards after contact. Had his highest elusive rating score of the season. He more than made up for Feagin being out.
11. Lunney needs to find a way to have more play designs under center. I don't have a ready stat for it but it feels like their run success rate out of the pistol and under center are miles apart. Michigan is a tough game to try to mix in more under center because of their pass rush so not sure it's something you see next week but it needs to be run more going forward. The team can't keep expecting Altmyer to bail out all of these 2nd and 8/9 yards scenarios.
I haven't seen this specifically alluded to here at loyalty. Did you hear this somewhere else or are we playing "everybody post a theory and see which one gets liked by an insider"?Starting to get the feeling/drift that Walters may have crossed a line professionally that might be linked to the long gaps from firings and hirings on the defensive side of the ball at Illinois. Like maybe someone caught wind of who we were hiring and bad mouthed Brett personally to spike the hiring. Which is on them for listening to that Dbag, but is definitely not something that is done in the old boys club of coaching.
That in addition to the more run of the mill recruit stealing, sign stealing, gamesmanship that is more typical of master apprentice coaching rivalries.
Offense was fine yesterday. Not really much to complain about there. Nearly 8 yards per play, and averaged about 5 yards per carry.What is really discouraging for me is all of the talk last week about self-scouting during the bye week and fixing issues.
1) why did tackling not improve?
2) why did run blocking not improve?
3) why don't we self-scout every week? I would think that world be the #1 thing on the list for the coache's to do. But per Henry's presser last week it doesn't sound like that happens except during bye weeks. But maybe I just misunderstood him.
4) seemd to me our pass blocking is getting worse, or teams have just figured out how to play against our offense. We don't seem to have an answer for when teams blitz.
5) it also seems like our edge rushers/defense ends bite on every fake up the middle and crash hard to the middle. I thought they were supposed to stay home and look for outside runs/reverses, etc.
I'm pretty confident there's not a singular incident, or we would have heard about it by now. It's probably that Walters got an ego about him and didn't care what rifts he made to try to succeed. Frankly, we are better off. Patterson's recruiting had fallen off big. Love turned out to be not the back we thought. Card is looking like we dodged a bullet. Kane might be the only one we miss? Seems like we played the run a lot better though of course we had Johnny freaking Newton.I haven't seen this specifically alluded to here at loyalty. Did you hear this somewhere else or are we playing "everybody post a theory and see which one gets liked by an insider"?
Something odd happened. Maybe us message board outsiders will never hear the truth. But none of that was normal.
I think a lot of people including Bielema would disagree with you saying he made a mistake there. I’m confident he would defend the decision and he would do it again in the same situation.It was a plus decision at the 2 yard line and a minus decision at the 18.
It's an unusual scenario (and even more unusual for it to matter the way it did), but there's not really any doubt about the math.
That doesn't make Bielema a bad strategist in general, we all make mistakes.
This season would have turned out completely different if the Illini had landed the more highly targeted Card from the portal and someone else "had to settle for" Luke. Thank goodness it worked out the way it did.I'm pretty confident there's not a singular incident, or we would have heard about it by now. It's probably that Walters got an ego about him and didn't care what rifts he made to try to succeed. Frankly, we are better off. Patterson's recruiting had fallen off big. Love turned out to be not the back we thought. Card is looking like we dodged a bullet. Kane might be the only one we miss? Seems like we played the run a lot better though of course we had Johnny freaking Newton.
Frankly, Bret strikes me as the kind to work hard and build meaningful foundations. Walters perhaps tried to jump rungs on the ladder by poaching our assistants and supposedly trying to cozy up to a lot of our recruiting/portal visitors. Of course Bret takes it personally, he hired Walters and it reflects on him.
From what I understand, it should've been called ineligible lineman... not OPI... which is massive because the latter is 15 yd penalty as oppose to 5.Unrelated, but can somebody explain the offensive pass interference on the 2pt conversion? Don’t recall ever seeing that called against an O-linemen and the replay didn’t answer any questions for me.
Head scratcher: We didn't stop the PU running game at all. So on the 2 pt conversion to tie the game they go empty backfield and and eliminate the dual threat? The one thing we couldn't stop? Pretty stupid play call on their part. Discuss.
Wild speculation trying to fish information out of true insidersI haven't seen this specifically alluded to here at loyalty. Did you hear this somewhere else or are we playing "everybody post a theory and see which one gets liked by an insider"?
Yeah it sure sounds like something specific happened, not just the long developing beef. I'll be keeping a close eye on this.Wild speculation trying to fish information out of true insiders
It just seems like more than run of the mill axe to grind. Football is full of guys like Walters (Brett previously being one of them) and it seems odd Brett would be so heated about a guys personality he has dealt with regularly.
it is mind boggling that our coaches could not figure out adjustments by half way through the 3rd qtr when it was obvious they knew how to move the ball finally .Offense was fine yesterday. Not really much to complain about there. Nearly 8 yards per play, and averaged about 5 yards per carry.
The defense was 100% the problem. Never adjusted to the offense run by the freshman qb.
Illinois football currently has the same record as or a better record than:
Georgia
Ohio St
Alabama
LSU
Clemson
Tennessee
Notre Dame
Texas A&M
Ole Miss
Mizzou
Kansas St
Michigan
Oklahoma
In the past 24 seasons, we have 18 seasons where we had 5 or less wins for the entire season and we’ve matched that in the first half of this season.
Enjoy the ride my friends.
If someone had told me when we were up 27-3 that we would win 50-49, I would have punched them out.
I would have gone full Mike Tyson 1990 on them.If that's the case... what would you have done if the Illini had LOST 50-49?... Yikes.
He would have punched himself outIf that's the case... what would you have done if the Illini had LOST 50-49?... Yikes.