Illini Football 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
#201      
The purpose of posting this crap is to get our blood boiling, and I can attest that it was effective!!! The only positive I can take from this is that various people are predicting improvement from Nebraska, Wisconsin, Mich St and others. Very few, if any, are predicting improvement from us so we have a perfect opportunity to surprise a lot of people. We have a lot of talent that is set for their breakout years. Is anyone in the B1G better positioned to be the Sleeper of the Year than the Illini?
 
#205      
EIU is ranked the 64th best FCS team by Connelly, which is slightly worse than average. They'll have a bottom 3rd FCS defense.

CMU is ranked 117th in FBS by Connelly, out of 134 teams. They have a bottom 25 offense and defense.


This is likely the optimal time to play both of these programs.
In years past, these games have clued us in on how our season will go, particularly in the trenches. I'm looking forward to our offensive line just absolutely controlling the LOS, or else we're in bad shape once the conference slate starts.
 
#207      
If they win some of their coin toss games this year, I think 6-6 is very doable.

But they can't afford to throw on the pads and recreate.

I think they have varying degrees of a chance in 11 games this year (I will be happy if they can keep it within 17 points of Oregon), but they can also lose those 11 games very easily.
 
#209      
In years past, these games have clued us in on how our season will go, particularly in the trenches. I'm looking forward to our offensive line just absolutely controlling the LOS, or else we're in bad shape once the conference slate starts.

It's been a massive boost that Bielema's Illinois teams are always competitive game-to-game. That said, it's also been a trend that those same teams rarely blow out inferior teams. Even the comfortable wins against non-conference teams have traditionally been the defense dominating moreso than offensive excellence. That trend needs to break against EIU and CMU this season.
 
#211      
In years past, these games have clued us in on how our season will go, particularly in the trenches. I'm looking forward to our offensive line just absolutely controlling the LOS, or else we're in bad shape once the conference slate starts.
So true. First three games we need to spank EIU and preferably not give up a TD, push around KU in the trenches (even if we lose we won't face skill talent like that again til Oregon), and beat CMU by at least 21.
 
#212      
Priestly has a chance to do something absolutely incredible. We need a RT that pans out so desperately. Props to Isaiah Adams last year for filling gin how he could, but we struggled at RT overall last year. Him and JC Davis have the keys to this car in their hands and I really hope they can drive it.
 
#213      
So true. First three games we need to spank EIU and preferably not give up a TD, push around KU in the trenches (even if we lose we won't face skill talent like that again til Oregon), and beat CMU by at least 21.
Both Georgia and Alabama gave up a touchdown to a FCS team last year, so allowing no TDs is a lofty goal. The average FBS vs FCS score in 2023 was 43 to 13.
 
#214      
My initial "expectations" (or hopes...) for the season are pretty simple - have fan enthusiasm for the Michigan game to the point where we are in striking distance of a sellout for such a special game. Given our attendance history, that will mean we get off to a pretty decent start to the year, and our fans truly believe we can at least be competitive with Michigan.

So, to do that, we HAVE to win the following:

vs. Eastern Illinois
vs. Central Michigan
vs. Purdue

And we have to take one of these three:

vs. Kansas
at Nebraska
at Penn State

In other words, I think we need a 4-2 record before the Michigan game, and to me that means beating KU.
 
#215      
To call it what it was...the staff really didn't do a good job last offseason from a roster construction standpoint. We didn't bring in a proven piece in the secondary and bet on unproven pieces. Same for that RT spot. Both areas were a disaster.

Much better job this offseason.

Outside of the main ones - Zakhari, Brooks, Davis - Priestly to me is by far the biggest transfer get. Tbh, I wouldn't really argue if you were to mention him in the same category as those other three. Provides stability at that RT spot - Just not having that led to so many problems last year. Stability and then some...sounds like he's really impressed.
 
Last edited:
#216      
In other words, I think we need a 4-2 record before the Michigan game, and to me that means beating KU.
This is kinda where I stand as well. I know some might think this is putting the bar too high but this is a reasonable expectation IMO in terms of the first six.

4-2 expectation.
5-1 an absolute pipe dream which I don't think has much of a shot at all but hey...not too many expected us to start 7-1 in '22.
6-0 virtually impossible.

If we go below 4-2...3-3 let's say...no the sky is not falling...but I'm just talking expectations. If we go 2-4 however, that's a disappointment.
 
Last edited:
#217      
I think the realistic expectation is to be 3-3 heading into the Michigan game, but that doesn't mean there isn't a road to bowl eligibility.

IMO everyone is sleeping on KU for some reason. They're going to be good. The early season hopes for an ok season don't end with a KU loss; they end with a Purdue loss.

Basically we need to win 4 of these 5 to head to a bowl: Purdue, Minn, MSU, Rutgers, and Northwestern.
 
#219      
I think the realistic expectation is to be 3-3 heading into the Michigan game, but that doesn't mean there isn't a road to bowl eligibility.

IMO everyone is sleeping on KU for some reason. They're going to be good. The early season hopes for an ok season don't end with a KU loss; they end with a Purdue loss.

Basically we need to win 4 of these 5 to head to a bowl: Purdue, Minn, MSU, Rutgers, and Northwestern.
FTR, it’s not a knock on KU … I just think IF we are going to start 4-2, it’s because we beat them. We spent our luck in Happy Valley in 2021, and I do believe our chances in our first road game (in Lincoln) won’t be kind to us … so upsetting KU under the lights at Memorial Stadium seems the most likely.
 
#220      
FTR, it’s not a knock on KU … I just think IF we are going to start 4-2, it’s because we beat them. We spent our luck in Happy Valley in 2021, and I do believe our chances in our first road game (in Lincoln) won’t be kind to us … so upsetting KU under the lights at Memorial Stadium seems the most likely.
We need fo exact revenge on how poorly we played at home last year against Nebraska.
 
#221      
Basically we need to win 4 of these 5 to head to a bowl: Purdue, Minn, MSU, Rutgers, and Northwestern.
I'd word it as "we need to sweep Purdue, Minn, MSU and Northwestern." It's very possible, but it only happens because we have multiple players play above the market's expectations.
 
#225      
We're probably not even gonna be more than like a 5.5 underdog in any of those three games (KU, NEB, RU). Underdogs...but slim. Now I get that there might be reasons to not feel optimistic about those games...whether that be trend wise trend wise (like I've mentioned several times with the NEB game) or whatever...but to count all 3 of them as Ls before the season even starts is just not a fair assessment IMO.

I'm not saying we should be talking Cfp births or whatever...this program has proven it does not deserve the benefit of the doubt on several occasions...but with the offseason additions and present personnel, feel like BB and co. deserve some ❤️❤️.

We'll see though...not ready not pencil in many losses (outside of maybe MICH, ORE, PSU)...but not ready to pencil in many wins outside of EIU and CM either though. But 6+ wins should be the expectation...and getting there shouldn't be much of a "dream everything goes right in this" moment IMO. Just me... 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back