I disagree. Purdue has lost 3 times to teams we have beat, and they had their full roster when they did so. Our loss to Maryland was without Kofi and with a sick Curbelo. We have only really lost to Purdue at full strength. We are far more consistent than they are - far more likely to be firing on all cylinders. At least so far this conference season. Only if Purdue can be more consistent than we are through the remainder of the conference season could they be considered a better team.
Even if they are firing on all cylinders like our last game in the second half, we would have stayed with them if we hit a reasonable number of the open 3s we had. This is what happens in a road game. Put us on a neutral court, don't call ticky tack fouls on Kofi to take him out of the game, have both teams playing at their best and I think we win. Think we would have easily won the game at home had the refs not taken Kofi out of the game (their bigs scored 20 more than ours in that game - we played their bigs to a draw at Mackey).
As we saw the other night Kofi can hold his own against Edey and Williams. They have Ivey and Stefanovic from 3 and role players. We have Curbelo, Trent, Plummer from 3, and role players. Will be easier to slow Ivey down, and defend their 3, than for them to defend Curbelo and stop Plummer, Jake and Trent from 3. Ivey may make a lot of 2s, but Trent Plummer and Grandison need only make 2 shots for every 3 of Ivey's. A lot of Ivey's success in the second half was in transition - which resulted because we were missing 3s. Making threes would have also limited Ivey's effectiveness.
Understand we just lost a not so close game on the road to Purdue - doesn't mean they are the better team.