Yep. Just like Wisconsin. Classless in my opinion.He just made sure his guy got the job next. All it is
Interesting that one reporter compared it to Jay Wright. Not even close.
Yep. Just like Wisconsin. Classless in my opinion.He just made sure his guy got the job next. All it is
Dad did the same thing, did he not?He just made sure his guy got the job next. All it is
Bennett will earn generational wealth off the sport. I struggle to be sympathetic to coaches who can't handle players making their fair market value.
I know it's a change in the game, but that's where having an adaptive & personable coach is ideal. Glad the Illini have Brad & Josh.
I have no problem with this. It's not as if schools don't fire coaches out of the blue on occasion, sometimes the table gets turned... Wanting to wait so that your #1 guy (Ron Sanchez) that has long been loyal to you can step right in as the interim, may not seem cool to some, but it guarantees a 1 year trial as the HC. You know the school will work the contract to their favor in case the program falls off a cliff and they want to cut the IHC loose.He just made sure his guy got the job next. All it is
What changed "essentially overnight"? Did I miss some news in the last few days or months?If my job description changed the way his did, essentially overnight, I'd evaluate whether that change was something I wanted to deal with,
I think it all depends on the nature of their complaints, and I don't know what Bennett's complaints are, specifically. I very much support athletes making fair market value as opposed to being exploited as unpaid (or under-the-table paid) showpieces.Bennett will earn generational wealth off the sport. I struggle to be sympathetic to coaches who can't handle players making their fair market value.
I know it's a change in the game, but that's where having an adaptive & personable coach is ideal. Glad the Illini have Brad & Josh.
still a crappy deal for the playersHe just made sure his guy got the job next. All it is
It seems like that's what it is and frankly, I don't blame him.
Exactly this. If the players are essentially at-will employees, then they really can't complain if their coach decides he's done at a moment's notice.I have no problem with this. It's not as if schools don't fire coaches out of the blue on occasion, sometimes the table gets turned... Wanting to wait so that your #1 guy (Ron Sanchez) that has long been loyal to you can step right in as the interim, may not seem cool to some, but it guarantees a 1 year trial as the HC. You know the school will work the contract to their favor in case the program falls off a cliff and they want to cut the IHC loose.
Exactly this. If the players are essentially at-will employees, then they really can't complain if their coach decides he's done at a moment's notice.
The job was easier before because they were exploiting their labor force's inability to freely move jobs or make money off their names...all while coaches did the same to become millionaires.I think it all depends on the nature of their complaints, and I don't know what Bennett's complaints are, specifically. I very much support athletes making fair market value as opposed to being exploited as unpaid (or under-the-table paid) showpieces.
On the other hand, I am sympathetic to the issue of having to recruit darn near a whole team every single year because everyone is a mercenary. Effectively, without contracts or regulations, every player is free to put themselves back on the market every single year. Not even the pros can do that.
Of course, if it eventually moves toward contracts that promise pay/incentives for staying with a team for a number of years, it may go smoothly for a couple years but I imagine that will get predatory quickly in the other direction (local car dealership offering a zillion dollars, all of which must be returned if certain metrics aren't met or if the player leaves, for example), which then rapidly leads toward collective bargaining.
Who knows. It's a time of upheaval and we don't really know what kind of equilibrium we will find. But coaches have to be getting whiplash over this. But if they are against players getting compensation for their worth, then I don't feel sorry for them.
Yup, don't feel bad or sad for these guys in the slightest.Old HC job
1. recruit HS kids
2. develop HS kids
3. HS kids have to sit out year if they want to transfer
4. Most kids used to stay 3 or 4 years.
New HC job
1. Recruit HS kids, recruit transfer portal
2. Re-recruit your own players every year and still have 50% transfer out every year
3. Deal with NIL$ demands
4. Many kids transferring 4X in 4 years. People will steal any player you develop with $NIL
Much harder job - every kid is free agent every year.
Still pays $2-$10m/year and you are famous.
And also not his job to hire the next coach.still a crappy deal for the players
College basketball needs more Tony Bennetts and less Dan Hurleys
Well said.The media is trying to spin this as a successful coach who is fed up with the current state of basketball, how it needs regulation for teams to compete fairly, etc.
All that would be fine and believable if it was the end of the post season and he made the choice not to participate in the portal/NIL chaos. Instead, he is quitting 20 days before the start of the season, leaving his players, new recruits, staff and thousands of fans high and dry. There’s clearly more to the story that we don’t know for Bennett to walk away right now and abandon everyone committed to him.
I certainly don't have all of the answers for what major college sports have become, but I don't think this is what people had in mind. I don't really have a lot of sympathy for the coaches who made a career out of something one step up from indentured servitude as well, but this age of "NIL" (which really isn't NIL - it's just paying players. Real NIL is student-athletes being able to make outside income with commercials, appearances, camps, etc. based on their standing as a famous collegiate athlete) and players getting to move every year if they want isn't what I envisioned collegiate sports to be.That's not how it works though. The incoming freshmen can't just go back to the other teams that recruited them and ask if the can come play. The upperclassmen can't jump into the transfer portal and find a new team before the season starts. The players are either going to have to play for uVA this season, and burn a year of eligibility, under these unexpected circumstances, or decide to transfer and likely sit this season out. They absolutely can complain about that, and Bennett can be criticized for that.
And players have always been "at-will" employees, in the sense that the program has always had the ability to cut players for both off-court and on-court issues.
I don't really read it like that.And also not his job to hire the next coach.
Basically a wealthy adult with the luxury of being able to retire at 55 taking his ball and going home and leaving everyone else to clean up after him.
So just to confirm, we need more uber-arrogant, pompous jerks who continuously play the victim to generate interest instead of upstanding individuals like Tony Bennett. Got it.Remember UVA's 1st round matchup last year? If more coaches were like Tony Bennett, CBB would die off in less than 50 years.
Bennett brought in 2 HS recruits and 5 transfers this offseason. If Bennett told them he was doing this and they still came, and also told his returning players while they still had a chance to enter the portal, then good on him. If not, then he basically chose to lie to 13 scholarship athletes in order to help out his buddy.I don't really read it like that.
I assume he was on the fence and probably made up his mind a while back but staying until close to the season basically guarantees that his long time assistant coach, Rick Sanchez, gets a year as an interim head coach.
It gives his guy a chance to have a good year and get the Head coaching gig at a school that he likely wouldn't be in the shortlist for.
I hear ya, I don't love it either. It's ultimately the NCAA's fault for refusing to face up to the inevitable and find a better solution that allowed players to receive compensation, but also provided some incentive for stability.I certainly don't have all of the answers for what major college sports have become, but I don't think this is what people had in mind. I don't really have a lot of sympathy for the coaches who made a career out of something one step up from indentured servitude as well, but this age of "NIL" (which really isn't NIL - it's just paying players. Real NIL is student-athletes being able to make outside income with commercials, appearances, camps, etc. based on their standing as a famous collegiate athlete) and players getting to move every year if they want isn't what I envisioned collegiate sports to be.