No hate for Domask here. I hope Domask does great. Luke simply has slightly better numbers than Domask last season (at least, %-wise and per min on some things), and the only reason Luke's simplest numbers like PT and PPG don't look considerably better was because he broke his foot. I just don't think that this injury should be the main reason he doesn't start.Why do you hate Domask when you haven't seen him play at Illinois? Luke might do great this year but he hasn't proved he deserves a starting spot. I am pretty sure Underwood will put the best players on the floor based on practices and not last year's stats.
I went and watched a bunch of SIU games before settling on him in both lineups. The main reason for Domask over Goode is ball handling, passing, and rebounding. Have you watched both closely? You can’t post Goode on a low block and have him pass out of it or take his defender to the hoop, that’s not his game. Goode is a catch and shoot guy with limited attributes elsewhere. Not to say he’s not valuable, he is, but Domask gives you more in other areas that make the team more dynamic than with Goode imo.But why would we choose the sharpshooter who doesn't shoot quite as sharply? Slightly worse FG percentage, slightly worse 3pt percentage, and slightly worse FT percentage going by last season's numbers, who is also an inch shorter (has a smaller wingspan) so he can't get his shot off quite as easily, and gets lower rebounds and blocks per min played? Yes, I'm talking about how you have Domask starting over Goode.
In my opinion, Domask simply hasn't earned it yet this season. Playing a ton of minutes and taking a ton of shots for SIU (even if you score a lot as a result) doesn't make you a better player than a guy with better %s and some better per-min stats playing in the role we need him to play, namely, mostly, to hit open shots and give our best offensive players (TSJ, CH, DD) more possessions. In other words, I don't want to see a mid-sized, somewhat-slow, sharpshooter missing shots that should have gone to our better offensive players, and last year's numbers show that Goode won't do that as much as Domask will.
BTW, I do like Domask off the bench for 15 to 20 mins per game and a potentially big scorer in that role. And all this is subject to change, of course, based on this season's stats and any injuries.
Look at that BU hair-very nice!
Agree with you Domask is more of a playmaker. However, I would still start Goode over Domask to balance out playmaking between the first and second units. But Domask would still get more minutes and would be on the floor for closing time. Just MHO.I went and watched a bunch of SIU games before settling on him in both lineups. The main reason for Domask over Goode is ball handling, passing, and rebounding. Have you watched both closely? You can’t post Goode on a low block and have him pass out of it or take his defender to the hoop, that’s not his game. Goode is a catch and shoot guy with limited attributes elsewhere. Not to say he’s not valuable, he is, but Domask gives you more in other areas that make the team more dynamic than with Goode imo.
What’s nice is they both can shoot and have some size, so you can somewhat interchange them, but for me, Domask has more traits (mainly ball handling and passing) that blend well with the starting lineup I presented.
But hey, if Goode outperforms him, then I’m good with Goode! Best 5 should start. Excited for the season to begin
Agree with you Domask is more of a playmaker. However, I would still start Goode over Domask to balance out playmaking between the first and second units. But Domask would still get more minutes and would be on the floor for closing time. Just MHO.
But if a Ty/TJ/Domask/Quincy/Coleman lineup out scores opponents by an insane amount per 100 possessions, can see an argument for running that lineup out there as much as possible.
Will be curious to see how effective various lineups are and what BU decides.
Don't know where else to ask this, but is anyone having issues getting the B1G+ website to come up? I am trying to create an account but keep getting errors when I try to open the website.
Can anyone provide a working link?
In regards to the Goode Domask discussion, I wonder if BU might start Goode initially as a reward for his loyalty to the program (and the fact, that he is good enough to start) and then maybe later start Domask if that is so warranted. Remember last year, I think there were not many people who thought Goode would start (and technically he didn't since he was injured in the secret scrimmage game) but he, BU, said he was going to start him had the injury not occurred.
The rebounding in that lineup should be incredibleI like that lineup actually but I just feel like DGL and Sencire at the 1 and 2 would be too risky. And I’d rather not try the “start the freshman PG at the 1” experiment again. I love Quincy and Coleman as our front court though
Rodgers
TJ
Domask
Guerrier
Coleman
Just tried it and it works for me (too many captchas though). Only took a minute or so.If this works for others, I guess it's on my end. This errors out and get this screen...
View attachment 28513
worked for meIf this works for others, I guess it's on my end. This errors out and get this screen...
View attachment 28513
Ding ding dingI like that lineup actually but I just feel like DGL and Sencire at the 1 and 2 would be too risky. And I’d rather not try the “start the freshman PG at the 1” experiment again. I love Quincy and Coleman as our front court though
Rodgers
TJ
Domask
Guerrier
Coleman
Yep. Dain, Luke, Sencire, DGL, Hansberry, and Harmon will all also play crucial roles in one way or another. Nice to have all that depth. I think Nico has really improved as wellI like that lineup actually but I just feel like DGL and Sencire at the 1 and 2 would be too risky. And I’d rather not try the “start the freshman PG at the 1” experiment again. I love Quincy and Coleman as our front court though
Rodgers
TJ
Domask
Guerrier
Coleman
Been saying this is my ideal lineup all off-season. Love the switchy fast 5-out lineups. Also think Dain can be a great spark as a sixth man.Ding ding ding
Dain probably going to end up playing more than Quincy but need “capable” shooters surrounding Ty to start games.Been saying this is my ideal lineup all off-season. Love the switchy fast 5-out lineups. Also think Dain can be a great spark as a sixth man.
I’d assumed it would end up being Dain in for Guerrier just because of how much Brad has been hyping Dain up, but I hope we rock with Guerrier-Coleman as the frontcourt.
Yeah, you make good points above, although the rebounds per min player were higher for the 1-inch taller Goode, than Domask, based on last season's stats.I went and watched a bunch of SIU games before settling on him in both lineups. The main reason for Domask over Goode is ball handling, passing, and rebounding. Have you watched both closely? You can’t post Goode on a low block and have him pass out of it or take his defender to the hoop, that’s not his game. Goode is a catch and shoot guy with limited attributes elsewhere. Not to say he’s not valuable, he is, but Domask gives you more in other areas that make the team more dynamic than with Goode imo.
What’s nice is they both can shoot and have some size, so you can somewhat interchange them, but for me, Domask has more traits (mainly ball handling and passing) that blend well with the starting lineup I presented.
But hey, if Goode outperforms him, then I’m good with Goode! Best 5 should start. Excited for the season to begin
Put Harmon in for Rodgers and that would be the oldest lineup we could throw out there. Lots of experience, if you squint hard enough might be able to see a sweet 16 lineup in there.Ding ding ding
Does anyone else hear nails on a chalkboard when hearing that nothing is really in place on offense yet?
Does anyone else hear nails on a chalkboard when hearing that nothing is really in place on offense yet?