Pregame: Illinois vs Ottawa (Exhibition), Friday, October 20th, 8:00pm CT, B1G+

Status
Not open for further replies.
#102      
Why do you hate Domask when you haven't seen him play at Illinois? Luke might do great this year but he hasn't proved he deserves a starting spot. I am pretty sure Underwood will put the best players on the floor based on practices and not last year's stats.
No hate for Domask here. I hope Domask does great. Luke simply has slightly better numbers than Domask last season (at least, %-wise and per min on some things), and the only reason Luke's simplest numbers like PT and PPG don't look considerably better was because he broke his foot. I just don't think that this injury should be the main reason he doesn't start.

Another less controversial way to but it is that both of these guys are very important in this 3 position for the Illini (mostly as a shooter) and both deserve to play a lot, so it hardly matters who starts. That's true, but it's kind of boring. So, I tried to stir the pot with this argument that maybe Luke should start. Obviously, we're waiting for real basketball action. I hope they all do great. It will be a cakewalk on Friday, but a real test a week later.
 
#103      
But why would we choose the sharpshooter who doesn't shoot quite as sharply? Slightly worse FG percentage, slightly worse 3pt percentage, and slightly worse FT percentage going by last season's numbers, who is also an inch shorter (has a smaller wingspan) so he can't get his shot off quite as easily, and gets lower rebounds and blocks per min played? Yes, I'm talking about how you have Domask starting over Goode.

In my opinion, Domask simply hasn't earned it yet this season. Playing a ton of minutes and taking a ton of shots for SIU (even if you score a lot as a result) doesn't make you a better player than a guy with better %s and some better per-min stats playing in the role we need him to play, namely, mostly, to hit open shots and give our best offensive players (TSJ, CH, DD) more possessions. In other words, I don't want to see a mid-sized, somewhat-slow, sharpshooter missing shots that should have gone to our better offensive players, and last year's numbers show that Goode won't do that as much as Domask will.

BTW, I do like Domask off the bench for 15 to 20 mins per game and a potentially big scorer in that role. And all this is subject to change, of course, based on this season's stats and any injuries.
I went and watched a bunch of SIU games before settling on him in both lineups. The main reason for Domask over Goode is ball handling, passing, and rebounding. Have you watched both closely? You can’t post Goode on a low block and have him pass out of it or take his defender to the hoop, that’s not his game. Goode is a catch and shoot guy with limited attributes elsewhere. Not to say he’s not valuable, he is, but Domask gives you more in other areas that make the team more dynamic than with Goode imo.

What’s nice is they both can shoot and have some size, so you can somewhat interchange them, but for me, Domask has more traits (mainly ball handling and passing) that blend well with the starting lineup I presented.

But hey, if Goode outperforms him, then I’m good with Goode! Best 5 should start. Excited for the season to begin 👍
 
#106      
I went and watched a bunch of SIU games before settling on him in both lineups. The main reason for Domask over Goode is ball handling, passing, and rebounding. Have you watched both closely? You can’t post Goode on a low block and have him pass out of it or take his defender to the hoop, that’s not his game. Goode is a catch and shoot guy with limited attributes elsewhere. Not to say he’s not valuable, he is, but Domask gives you more in other areas that make the team more dynamic than with Goode imo.

What’s nice is they both can shoot and have some size, so you can somewhat interchange them, but for me, Domask has more traits (mainly ball handling and passing) that blend well with the starting lineup I presented.

But hey, if Goode outperforms him, then I’m good with Goode! Best 5 should start. Excited for the season to begin 👍
Agree with you Domask is more of a playmaker. However, I would still start Goode over Domask to balance out playmaking between the first and second units. But Domask would still get more minutes and would be on the floor for closing time. Just MHO.

But if a Ty/TJ/Domask/Quincy/Coleman lineup out scores opponents by an insane amount per 100 possessions, can see an argument for running that lineup out there as much as possible.

Will be curious to see how effective various lineups are and what BU decides.
 
#107      
Agree with you Domask is more of a playmaker. However, I would still start Goode over Domask to balance out playmaking between the first and second units. But Domask would still get more minutes and would be on the floor for closing time. Just MHO.

But if a Ty/TJ/Domask/Quincy/Coleman lineup out scores opponents by an insane amount per 100 possessions, can see an argument for running that lineup out there as much as possible.

Will be curious to see how effective various lineups are and what BU decides.

I think idea of first/second units gets really over talked about in college sports and its really more of a thing in the NBA where the games are longer and you can generally trust most of the guys on the bench to at least not hurt the team. Coaches are good at staggering minutes and subs in a way that they almost always have a couple starters on the floor at any given time and BU has shown he is willing to make early subs to do that. For example maybe Domask only plays the first 4-5 minutes and subs out at the first media timeout so that by the time TSJ needs a breather he is fresh and ready to take over for that short stretch.
 
#109      
Don't know where else to ask this, but is anyone having issues getting the B1G+ website to come up? I am trying to create an account but keep getting errors when I try to open the website.

Can anyone provide a working link?
 
#110      
In regards to the Goode Domask discussion, I wonder if BU might start Goode initially as a reward for his loyalty to the program (and the fact, that he is good enough to start) and then maybe later start Domask if that is so warranted. Remember last year, I think there were not many people who thought Goode would start (and technically he didn't since he was injured in the secret scrimmage game) but he, BU, said he was going to start him had the injury not occurred.
 
#111      
Don't know where else to ask this, but is anyone having issues getting the B1G+ website to come up? I am trying to create an account but keep getting errors when I try to open the website.

Can anyone provide a working link?
 
#112      
In regards to the Goode Domask discussion, I wonder if BU might start Goode initially as a reward for his loyalty to the program (and the fact, that he is good enough to start) and then maybe later start Domask if that is so warranted. Remember last year, I think there were not many people who thought Goode would start (and technically he didn't since he was injured in the secret scrimmage game) but he, BU, said he was going to start him had the injury not occurred.

Everything that is coming out of practice reports is Domask is our no doubt second or third best player and it isn't close. Game 1, Domask is going to be in the starting line up
 
#113      
If this works for others, I guess it's on my end. This errors out and get this screen...

1697740516427.png
 
#114      
I like that lineup actually but I just feel like DGL and Sencire at the 1 and 2 would be too risky. And I’d rather not try the “start the freshman PG at the 1” experiment again. I love Quincy and Coleman as our front court though

Rodgers
TJ
Domask
Guerrier
Coleman
The rebounding in that lineup should be incredible
 
#118      
I like that lineup actually but I just feel like DGL and Sencire at the 1 and 2 would be too risky. And I’d rather not try the “start the freshman PG at the 1” experiment again. I love Quincy and Coleman as our front court though

Rodgers
TJ
Domask
Guerrier
Coleman
Yep. Dain, Luke, Sencire, DGL, Hansberry, and Harmon will all also play crucial roles in one way or another. Nice to have all that depth. I think Nico has really improved as well
 
#119      
Ding ding ding
Been saying this is my ideal lineup all off-season. Love the switchy fast 5-out lineups. Also think Dain can be a great spark as a sixth man.

I’d assumed it would end up being Dain in for Guerrier just because of how much Brad has been hyping Dain up, but I hope we rock with Guerrier-Coleman as the frontcourt.
 
#120      
Been saying this is my ideal lineup all off-season. Love the switchy fast 5-out lineups. Also think Dain can be a great spark as a sixth man.

I’d assumed it would end up being Dain in for Guerrier just because of how much Brad has been hyping Dain up, but I hope we rock with Guerrier-Coleman as the frontcourt.
Dain probably going to end up playing more than Quincy but need “capable” shooters surrounding Ty to start games.
 
#121      
I went and watched a bunch of SIU games before settling on him in both lineups. The main reason for Domask over Goode is ball handling, passing, and rebounding. Have you watched both closely? You can’t post Goode on a low block and have him pass out of it or take his defender to the hoop, that’s not his game. Goode is a catch and shoot guy with limited attributes elsewhere. Not to say he’s not valuable, he is, but Domask gives you more in other areas that make the team more dynamic than with Goode imo.

What’s nice is they both can shoot and have some size, so you can somewhat interchange them, but for me, Domask has more traits (mainly ball handling and passing) that blend well with the starting lineup I presented.

But hey, if Goode outperforms him, then I’m good with Goode! Best 5 should start. Excited for the season to begin 👍
Yeah, you make good points above, although the rebounds per min player were higher for the 1-inch taller Goode, than Domask, based on last season's stats.

I've seen some extended highlights for Domask from last season, but one doesn't see many missed shots and TOs (almost none) among those (since they are rare highlights), so I look forward to seeing more of Domask's play. I expect you are correct on the ball handling and passing, but these are harder to measure with the normal stats. Regarding that, we have TOs per min played (I think in Domask's favor, but I need to double check) and assists per min played (definitely in Domask's favor, since we checked that here before) and steals per min played (again in Domask's favor, from our prior checks). So, Domask does seem better in terms of ball handing and passing in those ways. My guess is also that Domask is a little quicker than Goode, although both guys are nothing like an attacking TSJ or SH.

I'm interested to see how effective Domask is in the low block. It seems neither guy (neither Domask nor Goode) is going to be great against BT competition in the low post. They just aren't big enough to dominate there, unless we go small, and CH and another Illini forward draw at BT opponent's 4 and 5 away from the basket. So, no, I don't see Domask scoring a lot in the low post (except on some offensive rebounds). Instead, the easiest way for Domask to rack up points is great shooting and great driving or cutting and resulting layups, pullups, bank shot's, etc. (including transition baskets), where he attacks the basket (while facing the basket) and sometimes gets fouled and makes his FTs. If that wasn't (mostly) his offensive game at SIU, then he must adjust and make this (mostly) his offensive game at IL, where he's likely to face more talented big men than in the MVC.

I'm excited too. Yeah, it looks like Underwood is being smart about keeping everyone up in the air on starting lineups and who plays the most. In truth, starting doesn't matter that much, but minutes played in important games in who is playing in the last 5 mins of close games matters a ton. It wins and loses games, so we might see it where is really counts against Marquette. That game will be hugely important for IL, and not an easy win for us. But I sure hope we can do it!
 
#124      
Does BTN+ have its own App or do you watch on the Fox app. Regular BTN games are on the Fox app
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back