Playing at Memorial Coliseum is certainly an advantage for us.
Memorial Coliseum, home of the Chinese Samurai bun.
Aside from those two gaffes, I thought it was a pretty insightful article.
Playing at Memorial Coliseum is certainly an advantage for us.
I think we CAN win this game. I give it about a 50/50 shot. My 2 big concerns are stopping Bridges and if we go in to one of those horrible offensive funks where we don't score for 5-10 minutes. THAT would probably doom us against MSU.
Memorial Coliseum, home of the Chinese Samurai bun.
Aside from those two gaffes, I thought it was a pretty insightful article.
I liked the article, too.
Author seemed pretty concerned about foul trouble for Ward. Hope we find a way to make that a reality.
I liked the article, too.
Author seemed pretty concerned about foul trouble for Ward. Hope we find a way to make that a reality.
Memorial Coliseum, home of the Chinese Samurai bun.
Aside from those two gaffes, I thought it was a pretty insightful article.
Memorial Coliseum, home of the Chinese Samurai bun.
Aside from those two gaffes, I thought it was a pretty insightful article.
The author sure makes them sound suspect, and experiencing growing pains. Makes me think we can win, or at least go down to the wire with them.
I don't understand this notion that MSU is a really good team coming into CU. They are not.
MSU is a completely different team on the road (poor). This isn't a typical Izzo SR led Valentine/Trice/Dawson or Appling/Payne or Green/Thornton/Wood etc. team rolling into the SFC. This is a injury depleted MSU team that must have all four freshmen play well on the road in Champaign to win. Unlikely.
I understand that Illinois is inconsistent and overall has not been very good this season, but neither has MSU and they are a terrible road team.
Illinois should be a 5-6 pt favorite.
My gut tells me somebody wins this game by at least ten points. So far, my gut refuses to disgorge the name of the winner.
I don't think it's inaccurate, though. Mav is effective, efficient, and a potent offensive threat, but smooth is not a word you'd use to describe his game. I say this with nothing but love for the guy, and a heartfelt appreciation of how much he has developed the past two years.Pretty good analysis of UI. Doesn't show much respect for Mav. Make him eat his words Mav.
I don't think it's inaccurate, though. Mav is effective, efficient, and a potent offensive threat, but smooth is not a word you'd use to describe his game. I say this with nothing but love for the guy, and a heartfelt appreciation of how much he has developed the past two years.