Kansas?So. . . who would the B1G go after if the Big 12 lost OU and UT?
I agree with this. I don't think either are going to beat Bama on a consistent basis, to even make the SEC title game. Plus, no way the SEC allows Texas to continue to have their own TV station.Seems really bad for both programs. Oklahoma makes the play off anyway and Texas doesn't need anymore trial by fire aproach.
I mean, UNC, Duke, ND and Virginia would be outstanding - this will be interestingDon't think Big Ten would go after anyone in Big 12 if Texas was not included. More likely that Big Ten will go after schools in ACC like Florida State or North Carolina. Academics also play a big factor in conference realignment for Big Ten
There is a less than zero percent chance of either of these schools joining. They don't have strong enough academics for B1G presidents and they don't have large enough fanbases to justify an equal share of conference revenue. Regional fit hasn't been the justification for conference expansion for a long time.KU and Iowa St
Ding ding. If we expand it's either going to be through the ACC or even, frankly, the Pac-12, which is struggling monetarily.Don't think Big Ten would go after anyone in Big 12 if Texas was not included. More likely that Big Ten will go after schools in ACC like Florida State or North Carolina. Academics also play a big factor in conference realignment for Big Ten
PAC 12 would be very interesting too, aside from travel times for the non revenue sports - but who knows - this will get crazy if UT and OU make a move.Ding ding. If we expand it's either going to be through the ACC or even, frankly, the PAC12, which is struggling monetarily.
I agree on ISU, but I have to imagine KU has a pretty big fan base, and while certainly below the majority of Big 10 schools, they wouldn't be the lowest ranked per US News and World Report. That would be Nebraska at #133. KU is #124.There is a less than zero percent chance of either of these schools joining. They don't have strong enough academics for B1G presidents and they don't have large enough fanbases to justify an equal share of conference revenue. Regional fit hasn't been the justification for conference expansion for a long time.
Nebraska barely made it through due to their academics. And, at the time, their football program was still a name brand with national appeal.I agree on ISU, but I have to imagine KU has a pretty big fan base, and while certainly below the majority of Big 10 schools, they wouldn't be the lowest ranked per US News and World Report. That would be Nebraska at #133. KU is #124.
Would Notre Dame deign to lower itself to be a member of the same conference as those “other” schools in the state?Ding ding. If we expand it's either going to be through the ACC or even, frankly, the Pac-12, which is struggling monetarily.
I mean, UNC, Duke, ND and Virginia would be outstanding - this will be interesting
bingoNebraska barely made it through due to their academics. And, at the time, their football program was still a name brand with national appeal.
Kansas, with an athletic department riddled with scandal, a football program that would immediately become a basement dweller, AND poor academics would be extremely hard to swallow. Ultimately, conference expansion is about football, it's about bringing in more viewers to the BTN, and to some extent in our conference specifically, it's about academics. I doubt KU's basketball program will be enough to justify their inclusion for the B1G presidents.
I thought we looked at Georgia tech in the past, could make a lot of sense.We’d need on more to even it out. I’ll throw out Georgia tech as I assume if we’re going south along the east coast, might as well try to get into that Atlanta market.
One of the big factors not yet mentioned here is TV markets. It's no secret Big Ten acquired Rutgers and Maryland for the TV markets in NYC and DC. That's the big reason Georgia Tech is always brought up (including academics) is the Atlanta TV revenue. Most of the Big 12 names come from absolutely tiny markets.
Priorities for Big Ten expansion:
1) TV markets (location and fanbase)
2) Football success
3) Academics
Yup.Nebraska barely made it through due to their academics. And, at the time, their football program was still a name brand with national appeal.
Kansas, with an athletic department riddled with scandal, a football program that would immediately become a basement dweller, AND poor academics would be extremely hard to swallow. Ultimately, conference expansion is about football, it's about bringing in more viewers to the BTN, and to some extent in our conference specifically, it's about academics. I doubt KU's basketball program will be enough to justify their inclusion for the B1G presidents.