Purdue's HR department must have informed the athletic department that having consenual relations with his secretary wasn't going to be sufficient to terminate for cause.What happened to Walter's getting canned this week? I guessing that's not happening this year and Purdont gives him another year.
What happened to Walter's getting canned this week? I guessing that's not happening this year and Purdont gives him another year.
Boiler fans are going to learn the full dark meaning of the words "not ideal". Honestly, the fans don't deserve that!Unless they really turn it around bringing him back after a 1-11 season would be a train wreck. They will lose a lot to the portal
I think they gave us everything they had left and now with they're completely demoralized with OSU, PSU, and IU still on their scheduleThey will bottom out hard
Where do they play IU ? At Purdue and I will take the boilers,they won't win until then but they knock off the self professed mighty hoosiers.I think they gave us everything they had left and now with they're completely demoralized with OSU, PSU, and IU still on their schedule
Fully agree that there are dirtbag coaches, just as there are many walks of life where people are operating under less than fully moral and ethical standards. But there was just too much smoke to think anything other than if Purdue could have legally stood on terminating Walters for cause based on his (alleged, but very likely) affair with a staffer, they would have done so. See - Tucker, Mel.Walters coming back next year is 75% dependent on his ability to hold onto his current recruits and add 7-8 decent preps to show his recruiting floor is still there.
The people hanging onto the salacious story components seemed to have forgotten there are lots of dirtbag coaches in this profession, it's either an open secret or publicly known, and they're still paid multiple millions because they win. If Walters can pick up a few wins or hold onto his recruiting, he'll have a chance at 2025.
and they still may be , but are just waiting for the season to get closer to ending .Fully agree that there are dirtbag coaches, just as there are many walks of life where people are operating under less than fully moral and ethical standards. But there was just too much smoke to think anything other than if Purdue could have legally stood on terminating Walters for cause based on his (alleged, but very likely) affair with a staffer, they would have done so. See - Tucker, Mel.
Athletic departments are a business. Financial considerations play a part in their decision making, and it is pretty obvious to me that they were checking to see if they could find a "terminate for cause" loophole to save the balance on the remainder of Walters' contract.
It’s hard to ask for 5mil every year for the next 5 years for a buyout, when you also need 5 mil a year for 5 years to pay players.Florida coming out and saying Napier will be back could be an early sign that teams don't have the normal budget for coach buyouts right now with the pending athlete payout starting next year and still scaling up NIL structure.
There's definitely something to that. The rise of coaching salaries has clearly been a result of those coaching being the one place you could (legally) allocate money to improve your team. Now you have to allocate of towards coaching and on-field (or court) talent. In professional leagues where that calculus has been in play for decades, star players make more than coaches.It’s hard to ask for 5mil every year for the next 5 years for a buyout, when you also need 5 mil a year for 5 years to pay players.
Head Coaches salaries should seriously be decreasing with the new setup.
Head Coaches salaries should seriously be decreasing with the new setup.
There will still be some rare cases where the coach will still make an absolute truckload of money. However, those cases will be much fewer and farther between. The crazy-high salaries will only be for the people with the Saban or Smart pedigree, and I'd venture to say that it will take longer to get to that point as well.There's definitely something to that. The rise of coaching salaries has clearly been a result of those coaching being the one place you could (legally) allocate money to improve your team. Now you have to allocate of towards coaching and on-field (or court) talent. In professional leagues where that calculus has been in play for decades, star players make more than coaches.